Preview

Absolute Monarchs: Louis 14th And Peter The Great

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
402 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Absolute Monarchs: Louis 14th And Peter The Great
Absolute Monarchs were eithere kings or queens who controlled the complete way of life in the country they ruled. Absolutism is the rule of one person over any given thing. The two rulers that showed absolutism in the documents are Louis 14th and Peter the Great. They were both absolute monarchs and both ruled over large territories. An absolute monarch has both positive and negative affects as a system or government. One positive attribute is organization. In document eight, Louis the 14th describes the necessity of organization when ruling a country. Without organization, a kingdom is vulnerable and its fall is imamate. With one absolute ruler, nothing is discussed nor fought over. As Louis 14th described, “The interest of the state
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Compare and Contrast Absolutism in Fran
    • 942 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare and Contrast Absolutism in Fran

    Absolutism is the acceptance of, or belief in absolute principles in political, philosophical, ethical, or theological matters. French absolutism started with Louis XIV and Russian absolutism started with Peter the Great. Louis XIV ruled from 1643-1714 and Peter the Great ruled from 1699-1725. In French absolutism, the rule of absolute monarchs was not all embracing because they lacked the financial and military resources, and the technology to make it so. France and Russia are alike in absolutism that they both sought to control religion and that they got the rich out of paying taxes. They are different in that Louis XIV wasn’t successful in wars, but Peter the Great was.…

    • 942 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Louis Xiv vs. Peter the Great
    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Louis Xiv vs. Peter the Great

    The 16th and 17th centuries, times of great change, were lived through by some of the most influential leaders known today. Two of which were Louis XIV and Peter the Great. These monarchs, different as the separate continents they lived on, shared only minor similarities such as absolutism and territorial expansion.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Comparing and contrasting peter the great and Louis XIV
    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Comparing and contrasting peter the great and Louis XIV

    Firstly,they were both autocrats,in that all decisions of state had to be approved by them.Secondly,they both wanted to curb the power of an ambitious nobility.However,they achieved this aim differently; Louis made his court at Versailles the centre of power,so the nobility had to spend all their time there if they wanted to have any influence.This kept them away from their own provincial power bases,making it hard for them to plot against the king.Peter on the other hand tortured and murdered any nobles he suspected of disloyalty.The main difference between the two was that Louis was ruling a cultural advanced,modern state - Russia under Peter was still very backward compared to major European states,so Peter worked hard to modernize Russia.Finally,both built up strong armies and used them for territorial expansion, thus increasing the prestige of their countries. Firstly,they were both autocrats,in that all decisions of state had to be approved by them.Secondly,they both wanted to curb the power of an ambitious nobility.However,they achieved this aim differently; Louis made his court at Versailles the centre of power,so the nobility had to spend all their time there if they wanted to have any influence.This kept them away from their own provincial power bases,making it hard for them to plot against the king.Peter on the other hand tortured and murdered any nobles he suspected of disloyalty.The main difference between the two was that Louis was ruling a cultural advanced,modern state - Russia under Peter was still very backward compared to major European states,so Peter worked hard to modernize Russia.Finally,both built up strong armies and used them for territorial expansion, thus increasing the prestige of their…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Did Absolutism Build A Government
    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Did Absolutism Build A Government

    Absolutism created a time of prosperity throughout the 1500s and the 1600s. At this point of history, absolutism was an efficient way of running a government. Absolutist leaders were vigorous, assertive and a potent symbol of authority. The amount of industrial growth in countries such as Russia was both efficient and effective because the power of authority was concentrated into one person’s hands. Absolutism enabled Peter the Great to modernize and adapt Russia for war, commerce and industrial growth. Additionally, absolutism gave people a powerful leader they needed to trust in and depend on for their country's sake. This type of regnant is most evident King James I of England and King Louis XIV of France. For example, King James…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay on 3 absolute monarchs: Louis XIV, Peter the Great, Frederick the Great
    • 797 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essay on 3 absolute monarchs: Louis XIV, Peter the Great, Frederick the Great

    From 1638-1786, there were three absolute monarchs. Louis XIV, the sun king, built a splendid court at Versailles where he looked over the nobles. Peter the Great, the westernizer, changed Russia from a backward country into a great power. Finally, Frederick the Great, the enlightened despot, was full of tolerance and restraint and had good views on government. He improved Prussia many ways.…

    • 797 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dbq on Absolutism and Democracy
    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dbq on Absolutism and Democracy

    Many rulers used absolutism in their countries. They believed rulers should have complete control over the country. Prince Machiavelli believed the best way to rule was to be feared and thought that the only way people would listen to him was if he was mean and scary. He thought if he was nice and loved then they would not fear him and end up taking advantage of him. (doc1) King James also believed absolutism was the way to go. He believed in divine right and that it was the only way to keep the country in order. He thought that kings were like gods and had the power to create or destroy anything that they thought was ineffective.(doc 2) Another person who believed in absolutism was Thomas Hobbes. He believed that people were naturally cruel unless controlled strictly by law. He said that to escape the brutish life people entered into a social contract which was an agreement by which they gave up the state of nature for an organized society. He also supported the Stuart kings in their struggle against parliament.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Louis XIV vs. Peter the Great
    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Louis XIV vs. Peter the Great

    Louis XIV was a Bourbon monarch who ruled as the king of both France and Navarre with one of the longest reigns in European history with a span of over 72 years starting from when he was five years old. On the other hand, Peter the Great was a leader who ruled the Russian Empire and steered the Tsardom into becoming a huge empire which became a major European power. The efforts of Louis XIV and Peter the Great to gain absolute control over their respective countries were strikingly similar, yet had few differences as they each used forms of political, religious, and societal advantages towards national domination.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    King Louis Xiv of France
    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages

    King Louis Xiv of France

    Absolute monarchs had a significant impact on European history and the way their nation lives today. Absolute monarchs had control over political, social and religious aspects of their nation’s life. Absolute monarch had a positive and negative effect on society and European history.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Absolute Government
    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dbq Absolute Government

    A monarch's authority to govern should be absolute because then there would be less conflict between differing parties. In Document 3, Bossuet writes that the prince need render no account to anyone for the orders he gives. Instead of having to discuss why a decision was made or discussing what decisions should be made, an absolute ruler can make a decision and no one would question him. John Locke believes that if the commands of a prince were opposed it would unhinge and overturn all politics, and instead of government and order, leave nothing but anarchy and confusion (Document 4). Differing parties are not only government officials but also the people being governed. In an absolute government the people should not oppose the ruler. Bousett believes men must obey princes as they obey justice itself, without which there can be no order or purpose in things (Document 3). The authority of a monarch should be absolute because there would be less conflict between differing…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism and Peter the Great
    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Absolutism and Peter the Great

    Many monarchs, particularly those of European descent, employed the flourishing absolutist philosophy during their reign in the seventeenth century. Defined as the "absolute or unlimited rule usually by one man," absolutism is virtually equivalent to the philosophy of despotism. A ruler incorporating the absolutist philosophy has complete control of his subjects and the highest authority with which to govern. With origins dating back to the Ancient Greeks, absolutism found root in some of Aristotle's theories: "Aristotle despotic government (nearly convertible with tyrannical) is that of a single ruler that rules, not for the public good but for his own." And from Roman political theory "regarding the power of the monarch, there had survived, particularly, a legacy of ideas associated with the position and prestige of a ruler which greatly strengthened the power of a dynasty.” Based on this Greek foundation in Aristotelian thought and Roman political theory, absolutism rose in other schools of philosophy as it gained prominence in the political world.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    King Louis XIV: The Perfect Example Of Absolute Monarchy
    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page

    King Louis XIV: The Perfect Example Of Absolute Monarchy

    1. King Louis XIV is definitely the perfect example of an absolute monarch. An absolute monarch is a ruler that possesses all of the power and Louis XIV was the most powerful king in all of French history. He took away power from nobility while also giving power to government agents with whom he checked in regularly with. This was a way to guarantee that he would not lose his own power. He did not have to take orders from anyone. He also believed that he and the state were the same, meaning that Louis XIV had total control over how France was governed.…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Absolutism And Constitutionalism
    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Absolutism And Constitutionalism

    Two prevalent monarchies in early European governments were absolutism and constitutionalist. They each have vast and numerous differences, but also share some common factors. These differences include, the amount of power the king holds in the government, the amount of power the subjects hold, and the emphasis on armies. While there are many differences there are some common factors such as; the kings retained the overall power, both monarchs had their nation’s best interest at heart, and both wanted to progress and strengthen their nation as much as possible using different ways.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism In The 17th Century
    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Absolutism In The 17th Century

    Absolutism is the principle or exercise of complete or unrestricted power in government. It refers to any political role player that has complete control. This means that they were under the control of a single leader. 1 We see this in the European states in the 17th century, where states were ruled by absolute monarchs. This meant the king ruled with absolute power, with no restrictions or resistance shown against him. This royal authority has been passed down from generation to generation. People believed that kings given a Devine Right to rule by God. 2 Therefore no one even thought of disobeying the king because they were afraid of God. Europe was an unequal society at this time regarding politics, distribution of wealth and social wellness of people. The states primarily concern was collecting taxes from the people, most of which was used to finance the wars.3 Kings did not usually feel a great sense of obligation or liability to the people under his control, because they…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism in the Seventeenth Century
    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Absolutism in the Seventeenth Century

    Governmental systems in both France and England were greatly changing during the 17th Century. In England, absolute monarchies lost power while Parliament gained supremacy. France, on the other hand, saw Louis XIV strengthening his own offices and weakening both the Estates General and the local nobility. Absolutism, a political theory holding that all power should be vested in one ruler, was attempted by James I and Charles I of England, and Louis XIV of France. However, neither English king could establish an absolute monarchy as successfully as Louis XIV. Louis has been hailed as the extreme absolutist; he epitomized the ideal of kingship. "Seventeenth-century France, in contrast to England, saw both discontent among the nobility and religious pluralism smothered by the absolute monarchy and the closed Catholic state of Louis XIV. An aggressive ruler who sought glory in foreign wars, Louis XIV subjected his subjects at home to 'one king, one law, one faith '" (The Western Heritage 430). Louis succeeded in establishing an absolute monarchy while English rulers struggled with a power hungry Parliament.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Compare And Contrast Monarch
    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Monarch

    An absolute monarch is a ruler who governs alone and is not restrained by laws, a constitution, or custom. Two absolute monarchs were Louis XIV of France and Henry VIII. Louis XIV ruled from May 14, 1643 to September 1, 1715. He was a cultural icon and was called the Sun King. Henry VIII ruled from April 21, 1509 to January 28, 1547. Both Louis and Henry built up the military, regulated or controlled the religion, however only Louis XIV changed the power of the nobility.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics