Preview

Army Leadership

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2054 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Army Leadership
Leadership… According to Webster’s, it’s simply referred to as “One who possesses the qualities of a leader…” If a person were to wonder what a leader was, they could get a fairly clear idea from the US Army’s Field Manual 6-22. This manual covers, with precise detail, what a leader, both military and otherwise, truly is. In this interpretation of what I feel leaders and leadership are, I will give the basic characteristics of leadership, what qualities are exemplified by leaders, and describe the effectiveness of good leadership in today’s modern military. It should be known, that “good leadership” is often a combination of multiple types of leadership that a “good leader” possesses. Such a leader utilizes a wide array of qualities with decisiveness to achieve a desired effect from those he or she leads. “Good leadership” is also, of course, a matter of interpretation and individual belief. One person may view someone as a “good leader’ who uses effective leadership, while another person may view the same person’s leadership qualities as being ineffective, unethical, immoral, dangerous and otherwise unhealthy for the general good of the people he or she affects.

What makes a leader? FM 6-22 describes a leader as:
“…An Army leader is anyone who by virtue of assumed role or assigned responsibility inspires and
Influences people to accomplish organizational goals. Army leaders motivate people both inside and
Outside the chain of command to pursue actions, focus thinking, and shape decisions for the greater
Good of the organization…” Some would say a leader is born a leader while others have the belief that a leader is created over time. Some would say a good leader cannot exist without experience, and others believe a leader can learn all they need to be effective from books and classes. If you were to ask me,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Authority and leadership are distinctly different and are often confused. Generally, the authoritative position is one that is appointed. People respect that person because of their position, not always is the respect earned. Leaders earn the respect of the people that follow them.…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As a Non Commission Officer in the United States Army, my leadership philosophy is simple. Taking care of each other is always a priority. Supporting our patients, comes first as we are responsible for ensuring the health and wellbeing for some of our finest men and women in America. Ensuring the wellbeing being of Military family member is also a priority as that gives our troop a peace of mind and therefore are able to focus on the mission rather that worry about what is going on at home.…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Putting the challenge of decision making on a subordinate, allows him or her to gain experience in problem solving. As a result, it develops their leadership traits and confidence. Furthermore, it permits commanders to focus on bigger issues that influence the mission or unit. Unfortunately, some commanders will allow the junior leadership to control too much. The end result being young Marines get confused and overwhelmed about what needs to be accomplished.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are many types of leaders in the military. To be specific, there are five different people(s) that take part in leading the Army. They are as follows (from highest point of responsibility to lowest); the SA (Army Staff) and CSA (Chief of Staff), the Vice CSA, the DCS G-1 (Deputy Chief of Staff), the HQDA (Headquarters Department of the Army) Heads of other staffing support, and commissioned officers/NCOs.…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Army Culture

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Army culture is the exact illustration of what the Army stands for. This culture is a system of “brotherhood”, shared values, goals, practices and attitudes held by the Soldiers. One thing that is always constant is Army culture, even when the turnover of Soldiers is so unpredictable. Another aspect is that as you progress in ranks it’s necessary to develop in leadership as well, moreover proving the Army to be a Profession of…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Army Professionalism

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Take action today. NCOs and Soldiers are entitled to outstanding leadership. As leaders, we must provide unquestionable leadership on and off duty while establishing and maintaining purpose, direction, and motivation. Soldiers should aim to achieve individual and organizational goals each day. Remaining steadfast to their tasks, duties, and goals, we need to ensure that Soldiers manage their workday and personal time wisely IOT accomplish the…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Army’s definition of leadership can be universally accepted and applied to civilian and military leaders alike. The difference between the two leaders is that Army leaders can never be anything less than the best. Army leaders are entrusted with planning and executing decisions that have far-reaching consequences. During his visit to IUP, Major General Piatt stressed how complex today’s battlefield is and that the Army needs leaders who are well-rounded. ADRP 6-22 states that the “ideal Army leader has strong intellect, physical presence, professional competence, moral character and serves as a role model” (p. v, 2012).…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the army there are 3 main FM 's that cover leadership. They are FM 7-0, FM 7-1, and FM 6-22. The Army 's definition of leadership is the process of influencing people by providing purpose, direction and motivation while operating to accomplish the mission and improving the organization. An army leader is anyone who by virtue of assumed role or assigned responsibility inspires and influences people to accomplish organizational goals. Army leaders motivate people both inside and outside the chain of command to pursue actions, focus thinking, and shape decisions for the greater good of the organization.…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Military Leadership

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As the organizational returns from a year deployment from southwest Asia. How does a mid-level manager, assumed so much destructive behavior within the organization? The current leadership has nothing but glowing comments about this individual. This person exhibited in damaging and destructive behaviors of a leader once the unit return to its stateside home base the military is governed by the Uniformed Code of Military Justice, set of guidelines and regulation which all members of military…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marine Corps Leadership

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In society, as well as the Marine Corps. good leaders are not born, but made. They are molded and shaped by the challenges and strifes in there life. If a person has the desire and willpower, he can become an effective leader. Good leaders develop through a never ending process of self-study, education, training, and experience.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human Communication

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In every group, a leader possesses all the leadership traits that one needs to be an effective leader. Leadership in the military is defined as the process of influencing other to accomplish a mission by providing a purpose, direction, and motivation. Chapter 9 defines leadership as a process…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Army Leadership are skills that every soldier should have regardless of rank. Leaders can have different philosophies. All leader's philosophies should have a positive outcome on their soldiers and leadership. My Army Leadership Philosophy focuses on leading by example, confidence and knowledge.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many different styles of leadership in the Army and the civilian sector. Because of my civilian experiences in corporate America, my leadership philosophy matured prior to joining the Army. Over the last 6 years in the mighty United States Army, I implemented the leadership experiences that I acquired in the Army doctrines. Consequently, my leadership philosophy morphed into a situational leadership philosophy. So far, this philosophy has not fail me yet. Applying situational leadership style, helped me mitigate every situation thus far, in my opinion, it is useless to have a vision, a set philosophy, categories and sub-categories of what you value as leader; without being adaptable. A situational leadership will always adapt…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As defined in chapter 1, leadership is a process whereby an individual influences a group of individuals to achieve a common goal. For a leaders to effectively lead a group of individuals, they should have qualities traits such ability to motivate others, excellent communications skills, be able to think fast in difficult situations, and be able to understand their followers needs. To a civilian, a leader takes the form of bosses at work, politicians on TV, or local government. In the case of civilian leadership there is a sort of disconnect between the leader and those being led. Civilian leaders are rarely expected to step in and work directly alongside their subordinates. Instead, they often lead from afar and in doing so run into issues with their employees often doubting why they are in charge.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Soldiers need to have the discipline to obey an order to attack a machine gun nest and face death. At the same time, leaders need to have the skills to motivate their soldiers to accomplish difficult goals. Discipline and leadership form a symbiotic relationship in which soldiers will recognize good leadership decision making processes and in return, develop a greater trust in the abilities of the leader. This trust will enable the soldiers to work harder to achieve the tasks put forth by the leaders in a manner that is conducive with how the leader would want the tasks to be accomplished. Leadership and discipline are like two opposite sides to one coin. While the infantry soldier should unquestioningly put his life at risk to accomplish a directive or order put forth by his leader, the leader needs to use his best judgement, knowledge of infantry tasks and skills, and experience to give the correct command in accordance with the situation at hand. While the soldier needs to be able to trust the judgment and decisions of the leader, the leader needs to ensure that the trust given to them by the soldiers is not…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays