Preview

Compare and Contrast Hitler and Napoleon

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
615 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare and Contrast Hitler and Napoleon
There were differences between Hitler and Napoleon, however I feel there were more similarities. They were both immigrants in the country they ended up ruling, both conquered most of Europe, both had radical views about fighting, and both were very quick in their fighting. However, the most significant similarities between the two leaders is how they were accepted as monarchs in a previously democratic society, and what they did for the countries after becoming monarchs. Hitler and Napoleon were accepted as monarchs for three major reasons. Both countries were hoping for the returning strength of the monarchy. The people of Germany and France were tired of inflation, and threats of invasion, and both militaries preferred aggressive patriots at their head instead of a politician. Both countries needed someone because they were both in economic chaos. Both men were intent in building a new type of state with a new social order. Both enjoyed the advantage of more or less unlimited power, yet they assumed this power very carefully and legally. When they assumed power they did much for their countries. They both pursued vigorous economic plans that balanced each countries' budgets, which had not been done in years. Napoleon balanced the budget in 1802, the first time it had been balanced in over seventy years, and Hitler managed to balance Germany's budget by 1938. Both men ended unemployment in their countries with nationwide projects, however, neither Hitler nor Napoleon came up with the idea. The programs of Hitler were proposed by Georg-Hans Reinhardt and Hjalmar Schact, and the programs of Napoleon came from many different people. By eliminating the economic crisis in their countries and establishing a feeling of national security, they raised national pride and patriotism to amazing levels. Both men also had similar radical views about fighting. Both called for a fight to the death when enemy armies were approaching, and when their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hitler and Stalin are names that will be forever remember as evil master minds of killing millions of people in order to create a perfect race. In this paper, there will be a comparison of Hitler and Stalin’s careers. Also, investigating which one had a greater impact on the twentieth century.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler commands the Germans to invade the Soviet Union in 1941 – this was Hitler’s greatest mistake, but was luck on the Soviets side or was it all just the leader Stalin’s good tactics and leadership? Even though Stalin was a mass murderer and a ruthless leader, he did one thing right. After the Soviets were losing battle after battle Stalin let his commanders fight the war as they knew it, did not interfere with their plan and stuck to his word, unlike Hitler did. Stalin let his commanders be true commanders and did not use them as puppets or for his own use. He was a true leader stuck to his word which is why I think the he was successful at leading his nation to victory. As the war continued the number of errors that Stalin was making got…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adolf Hitler and Winston Churchill were leaders of two very different countries. Hitler was the overseer of Germany, while Churchill was the Prime Minister of Britain. These two rulers were on different sides of World War Two. Because of this, Hitler and Churchill had different views about political ideologies, treatment of their citizens, and goals they wanted to achieve.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr. (MLK) and Aldolf Hitler were very different. MLK wanted all races to come together while Hitler wanted to "eliminate" inferior races. MLK wanted whites and blacks to come together as one. I personally believe it doesn't matter what's on the outside because we all have the same thing on the inside.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The issue with the most differences is obviously that of war and violence. In his work "The Qualities of a Prince" Machiavelli claimed that a good ruler must always be prepared for war. Even when their country is not at war, the ruler must be constantly considering combat. They must take the time to look at the land in which any battle will be fought, whether that is in their kingdom or that of their enemies.…

    • 743 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Henry David Thoreau once stated in Civil Disobedience “I was not born to be forced. Let us see who is the strongest. What force had multitude? Thoreau, the father of Transcendentalism, would have never predicted the events that would take place because of Hitler, nearly a century later, the way Hitler took what he wanted and did not care what people he affected. Both Hitler and Thoreau have one thing in common, they are willing to fight for what they believe, but how they differ is their methods. If Adolf Hitler and Henry Thoreau had worked together, Thoreau’s beliefs in Civil disobedience and individuality through simplicity would have transformed the way that Hitler used totalitarism methods during his reign as leader of Germany.…

    • 2625 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    E. Adolf Hitler and Saddam Hussein are similar in foreign policies, unification of followers, political affiliations, invasions, crimes against humanity, and religious opposition and are different in the reasons they got power and economic policies.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Napoleon’s personal greed for power drove him to infringe the basic principles of the revolution on the rights to hereditary and absolute rule. Robespierre, an enlightened leader of the Jacobins, stated that the purpose of the French Revolution was to abolish absolute monarchy and institute a “democratic or republican government” that could help increase political equality within a nation (Robespierre). However, Napoleon rejected any republican form of government; he was solely concerned with maintaining a “hereditary power, which… may endure for generations, even for centuries” (Selected). Ironically though, in hopes to gain popularity among members of the 3rd estate, he abolished the power of the nobility and appointed governors that were loyal to the central government. Not only did he crown himself emperor of France, but also, “he established an imperial court and the members of his family were made royalty, while other titles and honors were given to his…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mao Zedong (Mao Tse-Tung) and Hannibal Barca are both have a different in several things. The first thing that they are different…

    • 223 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Research

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The first similarity that comes in mind when talking about these two infamous leaders is their troubled childhood. Both of them were known to have suffered losses that affected them negatively and caused them to be corrupted. Lord Voldemort was the son of the witch Merope Gaunt and muggle (a non wizard) Tom Riddle, whom Merope ensnared with a love potion. When her husband discovers she was a witch, he abandons her while she is pregnant. Instead of choosing to live for her son, “[she] chose death in spite of a son who needed her” and Tom 's mother died shortly after giving birth to him on December 31st, living just long enough to christen him with the ordinary name, Tom Riddle (Rowling 262). Just like Lord Voldemort, Hitler also had a childhood burdened with abandonment and heavy losses.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition to their similarities, these men also have numerous differences. Roosevelt was well known for his kind demeanor and his ability to lead the United States during depression and war. Hitler was known for being a dictator and a mass murderer. Roosevelt felt sympathy for the people and his choices in politics reflected this. Hitler was arrogant and racist against various groups of people.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For starters, both Napoleon and Pol Pot made attempts to rid parts of their 'old societies'. To do so, Napoleon burned all human tools and avoided the Manor House. He also pushed the animals to work harder than ever on the farm. "All that year the animals worked like slaves. But they were happy to work; they grudged no effort or sacrifice well aware that everything they did was for the benefit of themselves and those who would come after them." (Orwell page 5) Similarly, Pol Pot destroyed all existing jobs and forced everyone to work back breaking hours on a farm to create a classless peasant society. Secondly, both rulers used the aspect of fear to control the other people/animals in the community. Napoleon always roamed around with his retinue of dogs to drill fear into anyone willing to challenge his authority. He was always quick to kill anyone that might be against him, even if the evidence was not prominent. In the same way, Pol Pot used detention centers such as S-21, to drive some into such fear that they confessed to things they were innocent of. The last parallel between both rulers is that they both adopted names that made them appear to be friendly. Although this was deceptive, the point was to brainwash all into thinking that their ruler was a friend, not a foe. For example, Napoleon went by the title Comrade Napoleon in the beginning of the novel to gain the animals trust and support. "Loyalty and obedience are more important." (Orwell page 50). Likewise, Pol Pot changed his title to Brother Number One. What brings Napoleon and Pol Pot together in comparison, is their violent tactics, controlling power, and use of…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charlemagne Dbq

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Charlemagne's desires were definitely similar to Adolf Hitler; They both shared one common goal which was the death of their people. Hitler was the cause of the death of many Jews; Similar to the death of pagans in Charlemagne's case. I believe that Hitler was descended from Charlemagne. There is no doubt that both of these leaders were a huge impact on History.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bonaparte DP

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages

    To be Ruthless means to be cruel, harsh and oppressive. To be Dictatorial means personal rule, autocratic, intolerant and tyrannical. Napoleon was both ruthless and dictatorial because he established his highly autocratic, intolerant and tyrannical rule in France in complete disregard for revolutionary ideals of democratic participation and representative democracy. Although he was supposedly a part of a three-man triumvirate, Napoleon was the only one who mattered as the First Consul. All executive power was vested in him and he had direct and indirect control of the legislative process. It was direct in so far as the deliberations of the State Council could only yield laws for France if he gave his consent. It was indirect but powerful all the same in the sense that he was the only one with the authority to nominate members to the State Council.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were specific laws put into place to restrict the rights of the black members of society in America as well as the Jewish members of the German society. Examining the harsh economic and political atmosphere during the Great Depression reveals striking similarities on Hitler’s treatment of the Jews and the laws and regulations enacted in the United States to restrict and control black Americans.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays