Preview

Constitutional Strict Rights

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
376 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Constitutional Strict Rights
The U.S Constitutional amendments place limits on what law enforcement and how a trial should be governed. These strict rights are to be followed because if an officer fails to abide by the proper procedure, the trial court may forcibly put an end to evidence obtained in violation of proper procedure or even release the arrested suspect. This is an amendment that deals with each of the following: criminal due process, arrest, interrogation, search and seizure, Miranda, punishment, the right to jury trials, and the right to counsel.
Criminal due process grants all people to be treated fairly and equally, especially to a citizen accused of a crime. The 5th amendment states that the federal government that cannot deprive of life, liberty, or

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    6th Amendment guarantees you a speedy trail, an impartial jury, that the accused can comfort the witnesses against them, and must be allowed a…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terry V. Ohio Case Study

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Due Process clause states that the United States Federal Government must uphold the legal rights and liberties of its citizens when they are arrested or taken into custody.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Due Process – the idea that the criminal justice system should operate under the rule of law – guides the actions of police, court officials, and corrections officers.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs Arizona

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Bill of Rights guarantees that everyone has the right to due process. The U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark case Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966) changed our due process by adding additional procedures to how law enforcement handles a suspect and ensuring they know their rights as American citizens.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs. Arizona

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda vs. Arizona was the case that altered the criminal justice system. It gives criminals the rights they do not deserve. Ernesto Miranda was the man who was responsible for the change in law enforcement. He argued that he was not informed of his rights during his arrest and his Fifth and Sixth amendments were violated. After that, the Miranda Rights were established to protect the suspect from refusing to answer self-incriminating questions and the right to an attorney. The Fifth Amendment’ s rights protection against self- incrimination and double jeopardy, and right to a grand jury indictment . The Sixth Amendment’s right to a speedy and public trial, trial by jury, confrontation and cross-examination of witnesses, and counsel.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fourth amendment protects the people from being stopped and frisked unlawfully. The 5th amendment allows a person being arrest the right to not self-incriminate themselves. Likewise, the 5th amendment can protect you from double jeopardy. The 6th amendment allows there to be a jury of peers. The 8th protects you from cruel and unusual punishment.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Paramount to any criminal justice career field is safeguarding civil liberties. Civil liberties are defined as “freedom from arbitrary interference in one’s pursuits by individuals or by government...”(Dershowtiz,2010). All careers in the criminal justice field protect these basic amendments in some way. Civil Liberties contain all promises and amendments contained within the Bill of Rights, 13th 14th and 15th amendments of the United states constitution (Dershowitz,2010).The 6th amendment which is summarized as the right to a speedy trial, as well as representation by a trial of peers is one of the amendments in the bill of rights that almost every career in criminal justice from correction officers to law enforcement officers and judges protect.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda Warning

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Upon the case Miranda vs. Arizona the Supreme Court decided that citizens must be aware of their fifth and sixth Amendment rights upon questioning by the police. Fifth Amendment: “…No person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself…” Sixth Amendment: “…In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.” The Supreme Court created the Miranda warning that a police officer must read to the suspect before questioning if they wish to have the evidence obtained during the questioning used in the court of law. Miranda warning: “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to speak to an attorney, and to have an attorney present during any questioning. If you cannot afford a lawyer, one will be provided for you at government expense.” If the Miranda Warning was not read to the person in custody before questioning, any evidence obtained from the suspect during the questioning shall be…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The 5th Amendment states that the government must follow the due process of the law before punishing a person and that all citizens had the right to a trial by jury. It also states that a person cannot be put on trial twice for the same crime or that person on trial for a crime does not have to testify against themselves in court - "Pleading the 5th". The reason for this addition to the Constitution was due to the British refusing to grant the same rights to American subjects as they gave to people in Great Britain. Many people were jailed without even being accused of a crime. This specifically referred to the right of a Trial by Jury and the right not incriminate themselves. The 5th Amendment is also referred to as the Double Jeopardy and…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fifth amendment guarantees the right of due process for anyone, except in certain clearly defined situations, to a trial in which you don’t have to act as witness against yourself or to charged for the same crime twice often called “double jeopardy”. The fourteenth amendment protects the rights of citizens in the United States. It also states the requirements, rights, and restrictions of those serving in government office.…

    • 190 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fifth Amendment Clauses

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This amendment is known to most Americans than whatever is left of the amendments due to the renowned expression: I argue the fifth. This expression is habitually utilized as a protection within criminal trials. The amendment comprises of five separate clauses. These clauses are double jeopardy clause, grand jury clause, the self-incrimination clause, due process clause and the taking 's clause. The Fifth Amendment’s guarantees Americans a few essential rights. For example, the right not to be rebuffed or attempted more than once for the same wrongdoing, right to proper sensible payment for any private property taken by the legislature for open utilization, and the right to trial for specific law violations by grand…

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fifth Amendment places constitutional boundaries on police practices. The police officers has an obligation to warn the suspects that they have a right to remain silent, that anything they say may be used against them, and that they have the right to counsel.[1],[2] The Fifth Amendment can be broken down into five distinctive constitutional rights such as grand juries for capital crimes, a prohibition on double jeopardy, a prohibition against required self-incrimination, a guarantee that all criminal defendants will have a fair trial, and a promise that the government will not seize private property without paying market value.[1] The Fifth Amendment applies to the federal courts, the U.S. Supreme Court, and states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.[1]…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due Process tries to focus on the rights of the individuals and limiting the power held by the government. People that wish to limit government tend to favor the due process model over the crime control model. In the due process model, people are innocent until proven guilty, and are not adequately punished until their guilt is well established through the criminal justice system.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jury Trial Analysis

    • 1128 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When an individual is charged with a crime, he or she becomes a criminal defendant. The United States Constitution provides these criminal defendants a number of rights that limit the fashion in which the government can investigate, prosecute, and penalize criminal behavior. These include, but are not limited to, the right to a speedy trial, the right to an impartial judge, and the right to an impartial jury.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fundamental Rights

    • 3928 Words
    • 16 Pages

    1. FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS It is generally accepted that the Constitution comprises rules that regulate the organization and exercise of State power, on the one hand, and the relations between the State and its citizens, on the other. The rules that stipulate and regulate the relations between the State and its citizens and, more generally, the relations between the controlling and the controlled are characterized as public freedoms or fundamental rights or human rights. Fundamental rights determine the percentage of freedom that the members of a certain society have in relation to State power, thus delimiting the size of self-existence and self-determination of every human being. It would also be useful to clarify that fundamental rights, when formulated in the Constitution, have increased formal power. This means that they cannot be abrogated or changed by a formal law or any regulatory deed of the executive power, but they lay down the limits and the legal framework within which State agents should act as regards their relations with the citizens. In this sense, fundamental rights have an interdisciplinary legal character, since they lay down the principal rules of administrative law, criminal law, labor law, civil law, as well as overall procedural law. For the notional approach to fundamental rights, the findings of political science, constitutional history and political sociology are useful, in addition to traditional legal interpreting methods. The enrichment of the list of fundamental rights and the re-conception of the content of the rights provided for in the Constitution are assisted by rules of international law, which are sanctioned pursuant to the procedure of article 28 of the Constitution of 1975/1986/2001 and are applicable as domestic law. An example is legislative decree 53/1974, which transposed into Greek legal order the European Convention of Human Rights (Rome Convention of 1950), whose formal validity is superior to any contrary provision of the…

    • 3928 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays