Preview

Disagree With Russeau's Statements Of Jean Jacques Rousseau

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
266 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Disagree With Russeau's Statements Of Jean Jacques Rousseau
I agree with Rousseau’s statement. Rousseau’s statement suggests that humans are not born selfish and he believed that democracy was merely a reflection of our basic sense of fairness and equality. I mainly disagree with Hobbes’ statement because there is a discrepancy in what he is saying. He suggests that all people are born selfish, yet we are enforced by a supreme ruler to avoid chaos. Using his logic, wouldn’t a supreme leader be born equally selfish? Why would we expect him to teach us obedience? If a supreme leader was as selfish as everyone else, what differentiates them from anyone else?

Rousseau’s statement also suggests that the natural state of humans was one of peace and harmony. That can be demonstrated in many ways. A good

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Unlike Thomas Hobbes, who believed humans were naturally evil, Jean Rousseau believed that humans are born, neither good nor bad, thus corruption or goodness is taught from the society. For example, when children are born, everything they…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau depicts man in his natural state as innocent and good, blaming the invention of property as the root of societal inequalities and lamenting the sacrifice of liberty required of members of a state. Rousseau's early man is deemed non-confrontational, concerned only with 'self-preservation'…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whereas Madison asserts that the State has no say over a person’s relationship with the Creator, Rousseau only rejects certain State religions on technical grounds and eventually concludes that society should demand a significant religious test. It is surprising that given Madison and Rousseau’s uniform goal, a stable society, they should come up with such widely varying methods for achieving it. One may be tempted to suggest that, unlike Rousseau, Madison considers individual rights to be more important than the proper functioning of society. Upon closer examination, however, it becomes clear that Madison and Rousseau's general disagreement on State power stems from a more fundamental dispute over how society works. According to Madison, society exists with a certain power and then instills this power in the government, while Rousseau argues that it is the creation of a government which makes society materialize. These disparate views on the directionality of government and society directly lead to Madison and Rousseau’s other…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rousseau Vs Hobbes

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page

    In favor of Hobbes, he does make several valid points. His theory in regards to constant competition applies to this day, as people constantly find themselves in situations where they meet others that are of equal physical strengths and could be faced with a conflict as a result. Despite the points that Hobbes makes, his theory is overall negative, as living in a constant state of fear and paranoia is absolutely no way to live one’s life. Rousseau is very pertinent to remind others of how life was before society and technology took over. Life was extremely simple, and everyone was fairly alright with living alone and focusing on themselves and their life. If today’s society was the same as it was over a thousand years ago, almost no one would…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes added to the ideas of democracy by creating the idea that all men are born bad with an urge for war. He stated that in order to have a stable society, government would be required to strictly watch and govern each citizen. He writes that man should give down their power to a much bigger government in order to maintain a single power that can help control the masses. This bigger…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Man is no longer himself rather he has conformed to society which he has described as a powerful and restrictive system. Rousseau believes that is man would have never gained knowledge from the arts and sciences, then they would not have the false values and motives or behave in such barbaric ways. He especially focuses on the idea of politeness. He claims that this is merely a societal norm because behind it, people are actually just lying frauds and that arts and science is to blame because it has corrupted out minds. He positively correlates the knowledge of the arts and sciences with the corruption of…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes was a philosopher who saw humans as a purely physical being. He believed that all human actions can be explained through the motions in our bodies. According to Hobbes all feelings and emotions are a result of phantasms, our perception of the objects around us. This perception is a motion within our bodies and each person perceives these phantasms differently causing love, hate, desires, and what we think is good and bad. Every feeling that comes from ones perspective has a physical feeling, such as desires can cause certain pains and it is only human nature that one does whatever is needed in order to relieve those pains. Hobbes therefore sees humans as being able, by their state of nature, to take or do whatever necessary for themselves even if it shows no regard for the other people their actions may harm. This inevitably would end up in a fight for survival or “the war of all against all”. In order to prevent such a war from happening Hobbes thought it necessary that the individuals must promise each other to give up their right to govern themselves to the sovereign for the mutual benefit of the people. This sovereign then has absolute power to rule with no questions asked and not to only act on behalf of the citizens but to completely embody their will. In summation, Hobbes believed that society could only exist under power of the sovereign and that life in the state of nature is violent, short and brutish, as all men act on self-interest.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This passage can be found as the first paragraph of the Second Part of Rousseau’s Discourse on the Origin of Inequality. It is one that encapsulates most of his general ideas that can be found in the Discourse in a single paragraph. Rousseau’s philosophy is that by nature, humans are essentially peaceful, content and equal. “It is the socialization process that has produced inequality, competition and the egoistic mentality.” (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy)…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau believed that in order for a society to be justified,…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Homework

    • 882 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau of France believed that in the state of nature, people would get along and work with each other. However, Rousseau thought that by interacting with each other, people would eventually become corrupt and…

    • 882 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rousseau came to the conclusion that the best way to examine the inequality in society is to examine the beginning of mankind itself. He tried to imagine the early state of man assuming there was ever actually a state where man existed only with the nature, in a solitary, and primitive lifestyle. He did not however revert as far back to the idea of the Neanderthal man to examine the ideas man held and where they came from. Instead, he looked at a state where man looked, and seemed to have the same physical abilities as he does today. Rousseau also concedes that a time where the ideas of government, ownership, justice, and injustice did not exist may not have ever existed. If what many religions tell us is true, then, in mans beginning, he was from the start, handed down laws from god which would influence his thinking and decisions. Through this, the only way such a period could come about would have to be through some catastrophic event, which would not only be impossible to explain, but consequently, impossible to prove. Therefore, imagining this state could prove not only embarrassing, but would be a contradiction to the Holy Scriptures.…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes, a British philosopher also known as an egoist due to his belief of what he thought of humans. Hobbes has the belief, "that humans are selfish by nature and only come into some form of civil agreement because we fear what might happen to each other if we were free to indulge our selfish instincts." The meaning behind Hobbes State of Nature is stated, "If you take away that authority, then you take away all incentive to be good". In other words, Hobbes' has the belief that we as people have questionable or to no responsibility and selflessness about our own selves to conduct peace or civility without authority. As to what Hobbes stated about selfishness I do agree, because in today's society and well before our day and age which I am sure it still existed, that…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes believed that everyone was basically selfish beings who would do anything to benefit their own personal position, and if left alone would act upon evil impulses. He believed this to be…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau deeply believed that humans are innately good and innocent and that life experiences and society cause their corruption, thus the Social Contract was formed in April 1762. This contract states that in order stop society’s corruption, one must be good and have good intentions towards others. In other words, he believed that if society were to vanish, people would be pure and happy once again ( ). He affected the government by setting boundaries between the government and citizens and became a foundation for sovereignty. He wanted liberty and equality. Another idea from Rousseau was to get as close as possible to nature. Nature would bring people happiness. This could be interpreted in many ways. Rousseau was just interested in people being more natural and true. His views about society coincide with the beliefs of Voltaire.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human Nature

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes believed that humans are naturally born selfish. His approach to human nature implied that selfishness was an evil characteristic each person was born with. His beliefs leaned toward the idea that humans naturally did what was best for themselves to survive, having no regard for others. This, he believed was carried out until other influences were met, such order or structure. Order and structure are just two forms of discipline…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays