Preview

Edward V. Jacob

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1085 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Edward V. Jacob
Riley VanSickle
American Literature 5th hour
November 16, 2011
Vampire vs. Werewolf
“Before you, Bella, my life was like a moonless night. Very dark, but there were stars, points of light and reason… And then you shot across my sky like a meteor. Suddenly everything was on fire; there was brilliancy, there was beauty. When you were gone, when the meteor had fallen over the horizon, everything went black. Nothing had changed, but my eyes were blinded by the light. I couldn’t see the stars anymore. And there was no more reason for anything.”(Page 514, “New Moon”) This quote is spoken by Edward Cullen in the novel “New Moon” written by Stephenie Meyer. The debate of “Team Edward” and “Team Jacob” has been on fire since the first Twilight book, only to become more crazed as the films came out. Although both have good qualities, the best choice for Bella is clearly Edward. Edward proves to be the better choice by his self-control, how he proves his love to Bella, providing a better future and environment for her, and his wisdom and creativity.
Starting off, a very important part of Edward is his self-control. “It was impossible… to stop. Impossible. But I did”(Page 460, “Twilight”). This is Edward speaking of having to stop drinking when he needed to suck the venom out of Bella’s blood; regardless that once vampires get a taste of blood it is torturous to stop. “I wanted to kill you; I’ve never wanted a humans blood so much in my life”(Scene 11, Twilight). Edward thinks of her like a lion thinks of his next prey, nevertheless he does not kill her. “It’s like a human only living on tofu, keeps you strong but never fully satisfies… it wouldn’t be like drinking your blood for instance”(Scene 13, Twilight). Admittedly, Edward wants to have Bella’s blood, just like other vampires; however his
VanSickle 2 self-control sets him apart from the others. “Sam was angry, lost it for a split second, Emily was standing too close. He can never take that back. What if I got

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ferrell V. Elrod 469

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages

    If profits can be shown with reasonable certainty, there is no reason to penalize the enterprise of the founder of a new business by denying remedy for losses occasioned by the default of the defendant. Ferrell v. Elrod 469 S.W. 2d at 686…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    King V Cogden

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ms. Cogdon and Pat’s relationship was a close one. Ms. Cogdon always worried about her 19 year old daughter Pat, who had for some time been receiving psychiatric treatment for a minor neurotic condition. Although doctors had said she was cured, Ms Cogdon often worried that she was okay. The night before Pat’s death, they had both gone to the cinema. During their outing they had engaged in a conversation having to do with the war in Korea. This war troubled Ms. Cogdon. She was worried it would one day reach her door steps.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On November 5, 1983, defendants Elijah Anton Askov, Ralph Hussey, Samuel Gugliotta, and Edward Melo were charged with attempting to commit extortion against Peter Belmont. The following men Askov, Hussey, and Melo had existing charges on possession of weapons, pointing a firearm, and assault with a weapon. The defendants had been in business with Belmont for supplying exotic dancers to licensed premises. Belmont was offered to pay 50% commission to run a business with Melo and Gugliotta in the Toronto area. However, Belmont refused and contacted the police to file reports. On November 12th, Belmont and his bodyguard were approached by the defendants in a tavern which was under surveillance. Melo and Askov were arrested on scene. Hussey ran away but later turned himself in and was charged on November 14th. Gugliotta was arrested on November 30th. The defendants Melo, Hussey, Askov were denied bail and were placed in custody for 6 months. On May 7th, the three men were ordered to…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this case of Goldberg v. Kelly we have an issue that discusses the termination of welfare to a recipient. Now what seems to be the issue here is that there used to be no federal or state law on how to regulate this and enforce this but only a procedure that the New York State 's general Home Relief program adopted to use and follow. The sole issue of the problem is accepting the fact that a person with life depending needs could lose their financial aid and determining just exactly how those procedures should be carried out and exactly what they will be. The Home Relief program adopted a procedure that notifies the person to be terminated from the financial aid funds a minimum of 7 days before it can be enforced. The recipient is then allowed to request a higher official examine their case and is allowed to meet with that caseworker to be presented the evidence on why they are being terminated from the system. The only option that the welfare recipient have is to write a personal letter or one assisted by an attorney and request that a higher supervisor take look at their case. The recipient has the right to request a fair hearing after all of this and is then allowed to present their arguments orally and cross examine the witnesses against him/her. If the recipient prevails at the hearing his is then awarded all his held funds that were being held. This is where the argument comes in as to whether the recipient should be awarded the right to a fair trial before the termination that takes effect after a quick 7 days. As I had stated before the main issue at thought is assuming these recipients rely on these funds and should not lose the right to these funds without a fair trial.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Branzburg v. Hayes was the only ever supreme court case to deal with reporter’s privilege. The ruling of this case was that reporter’s had no right to hide their sources in a court case. The chief justice at the time,Warren Burger, made a point that reporters, “like other citizens, [must] respond to relevant questions put to them in the course of a valid grand jury investigation or criminal trial (Fargo,2010).” With a decision that was five for and four against, this case was not an open and shut many thought it to be. Calling into play a look at the first amendment and what it really means when it says the freedom of speech. Interpreting a document that is more than two hundred years old is not an easy task to accomplish, having to combine…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The first portion of the story is about the planning of Bella and Edward’s wedding, the wedding, their honeymoon, and the discovery of Bella’s pregnancy. Before the wedding, Bella mentions that her good friend, Jacob Black, who loved Bella, has ran away. She is very saddened by the thought because…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Buchanan V. Warley

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This case was the first to be brought to Supreme Court by the newly organized civil rights organization, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). Moorfield Storey argued the case for Buchanan. This case was of course odd. Buchanan, a white man, was suing Warley, a black, to force him to buy a house in a mainly…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mcculloch V. Maryland

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In many ways, the opinion in this case represents a final step in the creation of…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. John Marshall means in his statement that the constitution does not allow the judiciary branch to rule in such a way that Marbury would like. Although Marbury did lose his job, the context in which he earned his job was unconstitutional. Marshall's statement is referring to the inability of the judiciary branch to compensate Marbury for a job which was given in an unconstitutional way.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)- It showed that black american weren’t able to sue in court.…

    • 99 Words
    • 1 Page
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    virginia v morre

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The day was February 20,2003, in the city of Portsmouth where two Portsmouth police officers had pulled a vehicle over who was driven by David Lee Moore. While listening to police radio they had heard that the man they pulled over who went by the nickname “chubs” was driving on a suspended license. The officer’s soon determined that chubbs was indeed driving on a suspended license. The officers who made the stop arrested chubbs for the misdemeanor of driving on a suspended license. This violation could have lead to chubbs serving a 1-year in jail and a $25,000 fine, according to Va Code Ann 18.2-11. The officers then searched the vehicle in which chubbs was driving. During the search of the vehicle the officers found 16 grams of crack cocaine and $516 in cash. The state law of Virginia states that the officers should have offered Moore a summons rather than arresting him. The statutes of the Fourth Amendment give the officers the right to search if they believe a crime was committed in their presence. The act of driving on a suspended license is not an offense you can be arrested for unlike other misdemeanors.…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It goes back to the election of 1800, when Thomas Jefferson of democrat republicans beat the federalists of John Adams. One of the most historic U.S supreme court cases to begin to emerge and develop an a effect on U.S history today was the case of William Marbury, v. James Madison. Explaining the origins and background of the case, I will discuss the major constitutional issues it raised while outlining the major points of the courts decision and the significance of the decision.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jaffee V. Redmond (1996)

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jaffee v.Redmond (1996) The case of Jaffee v. Redmond was taken up by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1996. The issue was whether a psychotherapist-patient would be recognized under Rule 501 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. The Court granted a decision that recognized the existence of such a privilege holding that confidential communications of a licensed social worker and a police officer be protected from compelled disclosure As reported by Levy (1996), the Court decided that all communication between a patient and a psychotherapist falls under the umbrella of privilege and, the psychotherapist can’t under be forced by the courts to disclose such information.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury V. Madison

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. Yes, the opinion of the court is that when a commission has been signed by the president, the appointment is made; and the commission is complete when the seal of the Unites States has been affixed to it by the secretary of state.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott v. Sanford

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dred Scott, an African American man who was born into slavery, wanted what all slaves would have wanted, their freedom. They were mistreated, neglected, and treated not as humans, but as property. In 1852, Dred Scott sued his current owner, Sanford, about him, no longer being a slave, but a free man (Oyez 1). In Article four of the Constitution, it states that any slave, who set foot in a free land, makes them a free man. This controversy led to the ruling of the state courts and in the end, came to the final word of the Supreme Court. Is he a slave or a free man?…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays