Preview

Estrada V. Aeronaves de Mexico, Sa. (9ththcir.).

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
592 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Estrada V. Aeronaves de Mexico, Sa. (9ththcir.).
Estrada v. Aeronaves de Mexico, SA. (9ththCir.).

Facts. On the morning of August 31, 1986, Theresa Estrada left her home near Cerritos, California, to go shopping at a nearby grocery store. She left her husband at home reading the newspaper, and her three children were still in bed. Returning from the store, Estrada saw, heard, and felt a big explosion. Within minutes, she maneuvered her way through burning homes, cars, and debris to find her home engulfed in flames. Her husband and children died in the house. Although she did not know it at the time, an Aeromexico passenger airplane had crashed into her home after colliding with a privately owned plane. Estrada suffered severe emotional distress from the incident. She sued for the wrongful death of her family. Aeromexico was found not responsible for the accident. The jury found the private pilot 50 percent liable, and the United States 50 percent liable because air traffic controllers had failed to detect the private plane's intrusion into commercial airspace and give a traffic advisory to the Aeromexico flight. The jury awarded Estrada $5.5 million for the death of her family and $1 million for negligent infliction of emotional distress. The U.S. government appealed the $500,000 judgment against it for negligent infliction of emotional distress.

Issue. Was Estrada entitled under the law to recover damages for negligent infliction of emotional distress?

Opinion. Hug, Circuit Judge. A plaintiff may recoverdamages for emotional distress caused by observing the negligently inflicted injury of a third person if, but only if, said plaintiff: (1) is closely related to the injury victim; (2) is present at the scene of the injury-producing event at the time it occurs and is then aware that it is causing injury to the victim; and (3) as a result suffers serious emotional distress--a reaction beyond that which would be anticipated in a disinterested witness and which is not an abnormal response to the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Plaintiff Robert Lopez flied a claim against Adelanto Stadium, Inc. claiming negligence on fault of Defendants insufficient design and/or installation of netting protection from foul balls under California Civil Code of Procedure §1714. Compl. ¶ 3. Also, Defendant’s negligence in failure to warn of dangers of foul balls. Compl ¶ 7. Mr. Lopez alleges that Adelanto Stadium, Inc. is liable on the sole grounds that they own the stadium in which Mr. Lopez suffered said injuries. Adelanto Stadium, Inc. moves to dismiss because Mr. Lopez’s claim fails as a matter of law, since it lacks sufficient factual matter to render a finding of negligence.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On November 28, 2008 our office received a phone call from a distraught woman, her name was Karla Girroir. She stated her husband was in a severe car accident while driving their antique mobile home back to their house on Thanksgiving’s Eve. I listened carefully, documenting her every word as she sobbed out the facts regarding her husband’s condition. I offered to schedule an appointment as quickly as possible with Janice Fisher, our attorney. She advised me she was unable to come in because her husband had fallen into a coma and she needed to be by his side. I stayed late waiting for Janice to finish up with her other clients. I couldn’t get Mr. Girroir’s case off of my mind and I had to speak to her before I could go home. I discussed the case with Janice and she immediately called Mrs. Girroir, I acted as a translator between Janice and Mrs. Girroir as she spoke very little English and fluent Spanish. We were advised that Mrs. Girroir had no way of transportation for herself or her twin daughters to come into the office. So Janice offered to meet her at the hospital.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There was over 600 pieces of evidence. Pink fibers were found on the bodies which matched to a bath rug found in the suspects home closet. By looking at both samples the FBI were able to note there were the same fibers connecting the suspect to the victims.…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bravo Fernandez v. United States is a court case that deals with Double Jeopardy. Double Jeopardy can be defined as “the prosecution of a person twice for the same offense (dictionary.com). ” Bravo Fernandez v. United States was argued on October 4th, 2016, because of an incident that took place in May of 2005. Mr. Fernandez, whom is the president of a private security firm in Puerto Rico, and Hector Martinez-Maldonado who is a member of the Senate. Both traveled to Las Vegas to watch a boxing match. Mr. Fernandez and Mr. Martinez-Maldonado were indicted for the trips payment. The charges were violation of the federal bribery statute, conspiracy, and the Travel Act. These charges tied Mr. Martinez-Maldonado’s support of legislation beneficial…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In a wrongful death suit for Stephan Andres the trial court did not err by rejecting the plaintiffs offered jury instructions for not providing a supervisor in the locker room required by Cal. Code Regs., tit. 22, § 65521, subd. (a), requiring that every pool be under the care of a competent person, which is not related to a lifeguard but the person in charge of the sanitation and hygiene of the pool. Negligence in itself only pertains if the person suffering the death or injury was one of the relatives for which the protection statute, ordinance, or regulation was adopted. Stephen, a victim of drowning rather than unsanitary facilities, was not related to the person whose protection section 65521 was…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Candidate Estrada, M. received the obstacle brief and only asked two question in order to clarify what he had missed. SNC wasted little time completing his notes and assessed the obstacle for a few moments before he briefed his team. His brief consisted of all the parts of the 5 paragraph order; however, he displayed lack of confidence in his tone of voice and gave a confusing brief that bounced around the 5 paragraph order. His decision making was slow during the execution and this was displayed through lack of communication to his team. SNC did not listen to the coordinating instructions very well, as he added they could not touch an area of the obstacle that was authorized, which was part of a previous scenario. The minimal communication…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A previous case Barmettler v. Reno Air, Inc, was big help for this court to decide whether the family of Boorman could sue for emotional distress. In that case an emotional distress claim resulting from the alleged negligent handling of a deceased person's remains. The court ruled in that case that it is possible to be under emotional distress and not be the person responsible for the funeral arrangements. This is why in Boorman’s case the close family members were able to sue for emotional distress.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Law 531 Case 5.1

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rules: The case was adjudicated on the basis of negligence law. Negligence is “the omission to do something which a reasonable man would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do.” Among others, negligence law takes into consideration: duty of care, breach of duty of care, injuries caused by defendant’s negligent act(s), and the likes. (Cheeseman, 2013). A particular negligence law considered during this case was negligence per se.…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Summarize: In December 1997, Dr. Abid Hanson and his wife, Rubina Husain (hereinafter respondent), traveled with their children and another family from San Francisco to Athens and Cairo for a family vacation. During a stopover in New York, Dr. Hanson learned for the first time that petitioner allowed its passengers to smoke on international flights. Because Dr. Hanson had suffered from asthma and was sensitive to secondhand smoke, respondent requested and obtained seats away from the smoking section. After boarding, they discovered that their seats were only three rows in front of the smoking section. A flight attendant refused respondent's three requests to move Dr. Hanson. As the smoking noticeably increased, Dr. Hanson walked toward the front of the plane to get fresher air. He then received medical assistance but died. Respondents filed a wrongful-death suit in state court, which was removed to federal court. The District Court found petitioner liable for Dr. Hanson's death, and the Ninth Circuit affirmed, concluding that, under Saks' definition of "accident," the flight attendant's refusal to reseat Dr. Hanson was clearly external to him, and unexpected and unusual in light of industry standards, Olympic policy, and the simple nature of the requested accommodation.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Supreme Court case of Sessions v. Morales-Santana deals with the issue of whether or not a distinction based on gender in establishing derivative citizenship for immigrants violates the 5th amendment's guarantee of equal protection. The questions presented by this case are: (1) Whether Congress’s decision to require different physical presence requirements for unwed citizen mothers than unwed citizen fathers in order to pass citizenship to a foreign- born child violates the 5th amendment's guarantee of equal protection and (2) whether the court of appeals was mistaken in granting citizenship in the absence of any statutory authority.Thusly, the rights of immigrants and the right against gender discrimination are both at stake for the petitioner of this case. The case was granted on June 28, 2016, oral argument was held before the Supreme Court on November 9, 2016, and the case was decided on June 12, 2017.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Us Vs Mexico Case Study

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Page

    I think the US should build a fence dividing us and Mexico because of the following reasons. First, the financial reason of this is when illegal aliens come to the US they feed off of americans health care and tax dollars from the government. Also a lot of illegal stuff can be transported easily across the borders. Immigrants often don't have health care because they can afford it and they cannot afford the medical payment when they become injured which affects the economy in America. Around eight million illegal aliens live in the US, and many of them aren't working. Americans also believe that immigrants have jobs that the Americans should have. Wage reduction is something that has occurred as immigrants fill certain jobs up. Language differences…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Gonzales v. Raich, the Supreme Court made a judgment that affected the California users of medical marijuana. Under a law the federal Controlled Substance Act, marijuana is a schedule one controlled substance, however under a 1996 state California law, marijuana is legalized for usage for people who have a prescription from a doctor for medical usage. When the federal Drug Enforcement Administration enforced the CSA by destroying one of the defendant's marijuana plants, the defendants claimed that their constitutional rights were infringed upon.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Washington Case Law Case

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Under Washington case law, plaintiffs are required to prove causation with expert testimony if alleged injury involves obscure medical factors. [cite]. The trickier question is whether the expert needs to demonstrate a direct causal link between the alleged injuries and the negligent act or if the expert merely must demonstrate that the plaintiff’s injuries are of a type that can be caused by the negligent act. Washington courts have come down on both sides of this question.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Did Ms. Attired’s behavior constitute “misconduct” and denial of benefits under New Mexico Statutes Annotated § 51-1-7?…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pichelman vs. Barfknecht

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Issue: Should Arnold and Sylvia Barfknecht have been convicted of a negligent tort against Betty Pichelman?…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays