Preview

Gasland Problem

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1013 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gasland Problem
Gasland Problem Tap water isn’t supposed to catch fire. It does in Dimock. Josh Fox, the director of "Gasland," chronicles his search to discover what gas drilling in the Marcellus Shale might do to his beloved Delaware River watershed should he and his neighbors sign the leases they received in the mail. That search takes him first to Dimock and then across the United States, where he meets people struggling with unexpected consequences of gas drilling in multiple states. He spent time with citizens in their homes and on their land as they relayed their stories of natural gas drilling in Colorado, Wyoming, Utah and Texas, among others. He spoke with residents who have experienced a variety of chronic health problems directly traceable to contamination of their air, of their water wells or of surface water. In some instances, the residents are reporting that they obtained a court injunction or settlement monies from gas companies to replace the affected water supplies with potable water or water purification kits. The film won a prize for documentaries at this year’s Sundance Film Festival. The movie is not perfect, but the people it profiles are refreshingly real. One homeowner clearly enjoys the thrill of igniting the water coming out of his tap: he holds a lighter to the faucet, there’s a sudden “whump” of blue flame, and he jumps back, brushing his arm. He laughs and says, “I smell hair!”. A young rancher living in a smog of petrol fumes emanating from the wells around his home worries about the health of his cattle and the quality of the meat he’s sending to American tables. One burly old cowboy whose water went bad growls that the gas company’s word isn’t worth spit."Gasland" is an activist film, but its primary subjects aren’t activists. They’re real people. And while it does not aspire to the objectivity of a National Geographic documentary, it also sidesteps the Michael Moore style. Largely absent are the guerrilla editing and snarky narration that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    When it comes to hydraulic fracking, of all the water that is pumped into the ground only about half of it comes back up so there is a lot of water that has the ability to get into the water table causing contamination. Companies cannot monitor water conditions until they know what to monitor. Residents of Dimock complained of issues with their water but the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) said their water was just fine and safe for consumption. The residents never had a problem with their water but once drilling started taking place in their area then they started having problems with their water. It is not just a few people in the area having an issue with their water, it is everyone having the same problem of not having drinkable water.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marcellus Shale is a geologic formation containing natural gas that stretches across much of the Eastern U.S., from New York to Tennessee. It has been a topic of hot debate over the past few years and continues to be a point of contention between landowners, governments, institutions, and private companies, even earning the attention of President Obama in his 2012 State of the Union speech. While geologists have known of the Marcellus Shale for years, early estimates of the amount of natural gas contained within it were fairly low. However, the use of the hydraulic fracturing (hydrofracking) drilling technique has dramatically increased the amount of natural gas that is recoverable (Geology.com). Current estimates suggest that reserves in the Marcellus Shale could meet U.S. energy demand for six years (Buurma, 2012).…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Too Frack or Not to Frack

    • 892 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the process in which the fracking solution is forced into the ground at high pressures, occasionally toxic fluids can leak out from the system and contaminate nearby drinking water. Environmental studies have concluded that methane concentrations are seventeen times higher in drinking water wells near fracturing sites. There are at least 1,000 documented cases of water contamination next to fracking areas as well as cases of sensory, respiratory, and neurological damage due to ingested contaminated water. Up to six hundred chemicals are used in the fluid solution they send into the ground, including carcinogens and toxins such as uranium, methanol, mercury, hydrolic acid, ethylene, glycol, and formaldehyde. When they bring the fracturing fluid back up after fracturing the shale rocks, to release the natural gas, only thirty to fifty percent of it is recovered. The waste solution recovered is then left in open air pits to evaporate, releasing harmful VOC’s (volatile…

    • 892 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thesis: There is major debate both for and against using the fracking method to extract natural gas from the ground, but I propose that the federal government establish, monitor, and regulate environmental and health risks, and then create a minimum standard which the states are required to follow. Background: In the 1940’s the Halliburton Corporation developed a process to revitalize well production and prolong the life of wells nearing the end of their production cycle. The fracturing process, called “fracking”, pumps a mixture of water and sand, along with some chemical additives, at high pressures to create additional fractures in the sedimentary rock.…

    • 1529 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Gas Man Cometh

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The documentary, “Gas Land”, by Josh Fox, is a film about the problems with contaminated groundwater due to excessive and unregulated natural gas extraction across the country. In the film, Fox travels all over to talk to many people who have rented out their land to natural gas companies, only to get contaminated water and no help from any company or organization with the problems that ensue. Fox uses many techniques in his film to get across his point that America should not be subjected into a wasteland because of poor industry ethics and unregulated polluting of our water sources. By building his appeals, especially to ethos, as well as arranging many elements of the film, Fox creates a very staunch argument.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On Deadly Ground Analysis

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Do you, Alaskans, ever wonder why you get asked awkward and absurd questions while traveling to various states? For instance, do you the internet there? What kind of money do you use? Does everyone live in igloos? Aren’t you afraid of bears? These typical questions are asked to various Alaskans for years. These questions arise in outsiders’ minds when they watch stereotypical media or read stories. The media has been their culture for years, and consequently, affected them mentally; especially stereotypical movies like On Deadly Ground. Steven Seagal is about the director and star of the movie about Alaskan Natives concerned oil companies after the big amount of oil that spilled in Valdez (city) and affected its surrounding creatures and nature. The movie shows great concern toward the Natives and the environment, and cautions them that the oil company only cares about money and nothing else. However, the movie does not end there. Furthermore, it presents stereotypical scenes of Alaska, which creates stereotypes and reinforces to the audience.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The environmentalist/anti fracking point of view shown in the documentary “Gasland” is a very informative, and important documentary that people everywhere should watch. The narrator, Josh Fox offers several valid and intelligent points about the possible dangers of fracking, and the many chemicals used in it. However, Fox is a very biased narrator, and at several points offers invalid evidence. For example, Fox attempts to instill fear in the viewer, in his controversial scene, detailing the many chemicals used in fracking fluid. While these chemicals are carcinogens, in the movie “Frack Nation,” it is explained by a UC Berkeley professor, that these chemicals are not harmful to humans. The professor states that millions of the chemicals in our daily lives are classified as carcinogens, but don’t give humans cancer in the doses we are exposed to. Some of his comparisons to chemicals giving cancer are almost as rash as saying one cigarette will give you terminal lung cancer. This is evident as even experts such as Alan J. Krupnick of Resources For the Future describe his documentary as an “Unabashed and one-sided bashing of the oil and gas industry... The relatively esoteric issue of fugitive methane gives way to some really outrageous statements." It seems as though Fox’s main goal was not to express the truth about the oil and gas industry, but his wild claims were more directed toward creating drama. John Hangar of the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection was quoted as saying that “This movie certainly contributes to more public misunderstanding.” Another key citation is the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission stating “Gasland incorrectly attributes several cases of water well contamination in Colorado to oil and gas development when our investigations determined that the wells in question contained biogenic methane that is not attributable to such development.” Fox is clearly not a reliable source. Also Fox’s main examples in the movie…

    • 897 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gasland, a documentary by Josh Fox, details the dangers of hydraulic fracturing. The film starts when Fox receives an offer from a gas company to rent his land and drill for natural gas. He travels across the United States investigating the affects in places where fracturing has is already established. Fox provides a strong argument that hydraulic fracturing is a danger to the environment and residents where the drilling occurs. He explains the level of government control and procedure of hydraulic fracturing and interviews residents and experts from the areas he visits.…

    • 845 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Over the past few decades, the United States has become heavily reliant on using nonrenewable resources. The excessive uses of these resources, such as coal, are extremely harmful to the environment and can be considered responsible for global climate change and the destruction of a once healthy atmosphere. Some companies have claimed to find a “clean” source of energy called natural gas, found deep within the Earth’s crust. Commercials created by these companies state that natural gas is easy retrieve, cheap and clean burning. However, these commercials fail to explain that one of the processes of retrieving natural gas, or hydraulic fracturing, is extremely harmful to the environment.…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The instances of water contamination are not unique to New York and Northern Pennsylvania. For the first time, Pennsylvania has made public 243 cases of contamination of private drinking wells from oil and gas drilling operations. The cases occurred in 22 counties, with Susquehanna, Tioga, Bradford, and Lycoming counties having the most incidences of contamination. In a few cases, one drilling operation contaminated the water of multiple wells, with water issues resulting from methane gas contamination, wells that went dry or undrinkable,…

    • 1987 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fracking

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Todays energy demands are at an all time high, and with that comes all time high prices at the pump. That is why we in America and in parts of the world are focusing on a relatively new process to obtain natural gas called “fracking”. Fracking is a very controversial process that we use to obtain natural gas. Fracking has pros and cons like any topic, but what I’m trying to find is if one side drastically outweighs the other. The controversy that aspires from this topic derives from the environmental well being of our planet and the effect fracking has on it. Fracking is the slang term for the process; the real term is “Hydraulic Fracturing”. Hydraulic fracturing or (fracking) is the extraction of mainly natural gas. The process of fracking is pretty strait forward; the first thing you need to do is find your location where you are going to start fracking. Once you find your location you begin the frack process. “Fracking refers to the procedure of creating fractures in rocks and rock formations by injecting fluid into cracks to force them further open. The larger fissures allow more gas to flow out of the formation and into the wellbore, from there it can be extracted”. gaseous gold. Seems harmless right? How could this simple process be a controversial issue for the environment? The facts may come as a surprise to you, but it all boils down to if the benefits outweigh the negative impacts.…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gasland Analysis

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The film, Gasland, is ineffective at presenting an adequate argument of how hydraulic fracturing --fracking-- is harmful to the environment or people around it. Gasland is a faux home video --documentary-- by an ‘average’ guy, Josh Fox who is living in the woods in pennsylvania, that is trying to convince the viewer that fracking is going to be harmful and overall bad in every way to the environment. He goes around and interviews homeowners in an area called Dimock, Pennsylvania. Dimock has had complaints about the fracking operations and how these operations have polluted the water and have caused all sorts of problems. He tries reaching out to the companies that are involved in fracking and was shut down.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The dangers of fracking

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Citizens of Kansas and Missouri need safe and plentiful water for public use and for farm and ranch performance. On average, a single fracturing takes 1-8 million gallons of water to complete each fracturing job. The water brought to the ejecting site in is mixed with Approximately 40,000 gallons and up to 600 different toxic chemicals including known carcinogens, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), hydrochloric acid, carbon sulfide, petroleum distillates, mercury, and other toxic metals, are used within each fracking. This adds up to 72 trillion gallons of water and 360 billion gallons of chemicals. There have been over 1,000 documented complaints of water contamination neighboring areas of gas drilling, as well as occurrences of respiratory, and neurological damage as a result of consumed water. The mixture reaches the end of the well where the high pressure causes the nearby shale rock to crack, creating fissures where natural gas flows into the well. During this hydraulic fracturing process, methane gas and toxic chemicals leach out from the system and and contaminate nearby groundwater. The drinking water in Kansas and Missouri is now contaminated preventing the citizens from drinking the local water. One other major problem that has caused nearby irritation is the earthquakes that are caused.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fracking

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Air quality is a major concern, but the biggest problem to fracking is water contamination. The cement casing on the shale wells has failed and released methane to contaminate drinking water. Some chemicals leak into the groundwater, which is the main source of drinking water, are too toxic to use any more. For example, in Dimock , Pennsylvania, fouled drinking water near fracking operations is higher polluted than other areas without fracking. Statisticians report that areas within a kilometre of a shale gas well are 15 to 20 times more excessive methane in their water. This high level of concentration is enough to blow up a house(Kaldor,2013). Neither industries nor scientists can name a solution to the water pollution problem so far, the local communities have to rely on bottle waters for daily actives, because they are afraid to turn on the faucets one more time.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Benefits Of Fracking

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the fracking process it is important to create a reliable buffer between the water table, earth and the wells, however using cement or steel has proven to be difficult. Over time the cement can shrink, crack and erode releasing gas into the water tables or air. The steel casings erode from exposure of the different acids being used and can cause leaky connection sites. In 2009 Cabot Oil and Gas drilled 68 new wells in Dimock, PA that the PA DEP determined caused the groundwater contamination which resulted in the sickening of dozens of people and animals. Cabot oil and Gas was cited seven times for not reporting defective, insufficient or improperly cemented casings. When the casings are not sufficient they can crack or even collapse letting the gas release into the groundwater. Currently the EPA relies on self-reporting from the fracking companies when it comes to collecting data. Dr. Anthony Ingraffea, distinguished professor of engineering from Cornell University, has said 6.2% of all well casings fail initially, 60% fail after 20 years and all casings fail over time. In PA there are over 150,000 abandoned wells that are decades or even a century old. A recent investigation into a methane geyser in Union Township, PA suggest that a 70 year old well with deteriorating concrete and pipes may have been the methane pathways causing the problem. If fracking companies were held to higher regulations and were required to maintain all…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays