Preview

God, Science Debate

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
639 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
God, Science Debate
God science debate
Wide spread myth that science has always been on a collision course with the belief in God and so therefore, natural science and faith in God are incompatible.
Argued by the new atheists - that science leads away from God.- leads to atheism.
Myth; significant natural science project of this generation is the human genome project. First director of it was Jim Watson- discovered the double helix structure of DNA he was an atheist.
2d director - Francis Collins hes a Christian who was part of the discovering of the human genome project.
Top scientist same project, same techniques of analysis, so what divides them is their world view.
Conflict is not between science and religion but much deeper, it is between two different world views.
3 families of world views
Ancient Greek world were fascinated by the universe.
Big questions they asked themselves; what is ultimate reality???
Atomist - Ultimate reality consisted of mass energy. They believed that atoms form galaxies, stars, planets, worlds, and the idea of God. - World view materialism
Two diametrically opposed world views:
You are forming your world view.
Jim Watson – materialistic view
Francis Collins – theistic view as a Christian.
Not do science and religion cancel each other out, but where does science sit in relation to those two world views. Two presentations of two different world views with natural science in the middle. Is natural science neutral or does it point to materialism or does it point to theism, you can establish any kind of answer by considering the evidence. Evidence sources
1. History of science,
2. Philosophy of science
3. Results of science.
History of the universe, invested interest in understanding it gives us a concept of our identity.
Personal God- and we are made in his image.
History of science - modern science explosive rise.
Motor that drive science;
Science is claiming authority to realise it’s not coexistence with rationality.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    “Science contributes moral as well as material blessings to the world. Its great moral contribution is objective, or the scientific point of view. The means doubting everything except facts; it means hewing to the facts, lets the chips fall where they may.” (163)…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article claims that by nature, it is impossible for science and religion to conflict primarily because their individual concerns are entirely distinct. This, however, brings about the debate of the role of both religion and science in our society. Religion I mainly faith based and is illogical, that does not require evidence. Science, on the other hand, is logical and is purely based on actual evidence. Many have criticized this idea on nonoverlapping magisteria claiming it holds no basis. For instance, given that both science and religion has different stories on how the earth came to exist, are they both teaching different domains? The debate lies on whether or not science and religion can co-exist without overlapping or…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    God and science, as Keller points out later in his book, are not in conflict, showing why many evolutionists are Christians. These insights give Keller’s readers a reason to believe, and through this he helps them realize all the evidence they never knew was right in front of…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some people believe that only science is correct. There is no evidence of the seven days of creation except by word, whereas all theories of evolution and the Big Bang have a large amount of evidence, and hundreds of hours of research dedicated to them. Evolution and the Big Bang have explanations for and biological reasons, whereas why would a God suddenly decide to make a universe and planet for living organisms?…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As scientists, or natural philosophers, made new discoveries and theories they often dedicated them to the church, whether it was literal dedication or whether the finding supported the church. Even though they meant to support the church, many of those who did not understand the findings rejected them, but the fact that the common man could not always understand what an astronomer had investigated does not mean that it should be rejected. For the beauty and usefulness of the discoveries support what the common man knows and understands which is that God is God. (Doc. 2) The pressure that came from being rejected pushed scientists to search for acceptance in many cases for fear of being outcast, and there was no greater place to search for acceptance than from the church. Nicolaus Copernicus, Polish priest and astronomer, dedicated his works to Pope Paul III stating how he was not one to shrink from another’s criticism and that his findings contribute to the well being of the Church. (Doc. 1) Copernicus was a man of the church as well, making his words to the Pope weighted, however. Natural philosophers used the church as evidence in their findings as well. Once atoms and the structure of the world were discovered, it was too mind-blowing to not believe that all this perfect complexity was not brought together by an all-powerful being. But seeing that most men during this time were in some way affiliated with the church, it was very common for men to make these sorts of assumptions. (Doc. 8) Religion thus gave scientists a reason for discovery and evidence supporting discoveries.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    At the outset of the nineteenth century in Britain, religious faith and the study of the sciences tended to exist in harmony with each other. The study of God’s Word, in the Bible, and His Works, in nature, were assumed to be two versions of the same ultimate truth.1 When William Paley published Natural Theology; or, Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity in 1802, he reinforced the concept of a designing God after positing that natural objects show evidence of design, emphasizing nature as God’s creation.2…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    As the perception of natural science and religious expression…

    • 2382 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles Towne Summary

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mr. Towne’s explains that religion and science are coming more together, the more that people try to separate them. Also, that we should not try to stand in the way of something that is inevitable such as this. When trying to understand why people see them as being so different, they eventually prove that they are quite similar. He went on to say if we can look at the nature of them, then they are “almost indistinguishable” (Townes, 1966). Some people see them as different because of how they thought of them. People see science as more of an experiment…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Science has had a huge impact on society in the past few centuries with medicines curing disastrous diseases and the growing success of technology. This success has led to a widespread belief in science; believing science can deliver well to the people in society. However, this success has been dimmed by science causing problems; for example global warming and pollution as these are both products of science. However the good and bad effects of science show features distinguishing it from other belief systems as it enables us to explain predict and control the world in a way that non-scientific or pre scientific belief systems cannot do. Science is a belief system as it fills the gaps which ideology and religion cannot fill and science also makes sense of the world around us. An example of this is science explains why earth is the perfect environment for humans to live on. However, Rationalists point out that science is based on fact, whereas beliefs are not: they rely on faith. Therefore, Rationalists argue that science is not a belief system. Dawkins put forward that science is based on evidence so science cannot be a belief system. Whereas some people use science to explain the world but we need to have faith in science, an example of this can be in regards to cures for cancer. Therefore people have faith in system and would claim science is a…

    • 1003 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It could be argued by the Western world, that science is our God. Due to the vast progression in science, man has been able to make amazing discoveries and accomplishments, such as putting roving robots on mars, creating machines that can go faster than the speed of sound and creating a thirty inch television that can be rolled up and be put in a paper towel tube for our convenience. While scientific discoveries and accomplishments are usually amazing, beneficial and bring further understanding of the world around us, there is a real danger of replacing God with science, such as those who hold the belief of scientific naturalism. Those who uphold scientific naturalism believe that “nothing exists except the material, there are no nonphysical entities such as God or souls”, as they shut out God completely and try to impose their beliefs on the world around them (Wilkens & Sanford, 2009, p. 101).…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Griffin, David Ray, Two Great Truths: A New Synthesis of Scientific Naturalism and Christian Faith, Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2004.…

    • 2863 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    between advocates of science from one hand, and the advocates of religion, which is apparently the…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Even though science is based on factual evidence and religion is based on mythical beliefs, the main conflict between the two is when they overlap and you do not know which one to believe.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lawrence Krauss has repeatedly stated that teaching religion in science is “child abuse”. The term, “child abuse” when used in this context is extreme. Krauss (2013) explains the purpose of education is to teach children the truth providing empirical evidence based on facts, and knowledge of science and religion do not coexist. However, Krauss wants to exclude religion from science because he observes that there are ethical boundaries in science such as telling the truth, but the methodology is to exclude religion from education in general because religion is fiction with no empirical evidence to support it but only have ethics. Krauss justifies how science based, not on ideology or testimonies science supports the methods with empirical facts that can provide us a better understanding to overcome ignorance. While “child abuse” perhaps antagonizing word to express Krauss’s ideas, on the other hand, creationism with science should not be taught in class because they based on different knowledge that also contradicts the other. Religion does not have a place in science but does have a role as a subject as long it is not mixed with science.…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Christianity Of Religion

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages

    But for this one in particular, once someone is set on a mindset about something, it is hard to persuade that person into seeing the other side of the argument and being able to see two points of view instead of one. This argument has been going on for thousands and thousands of years because there are people that believe such a power exists because without it, how would we exist today? Many of us believe that through prayer and guidance, not only will we have God in our hearts and be saved, but also be able to see the world God had built for us and understand its beauty through his eyes. While on the other hand, Science has proven countless times for certain occasions as to why things are ought to be the way they are. There are many Scientists that have researched and try to prove the existence of God. Though accepting that there is a higher power out there, but also believing that it is possible to unravel a mystery and understand the reasoning behind…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays