Preview

Jacksonian Democrats

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
452 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jacksonian Democrats
The 1820's and 1830's were times where the Jacksonian Democrats dominated politics in the United States. Jacksonian Democrats saw themselves as guardians of the United States Constitution, political democracy, individual liberty, and equality of economic opportunity. With a few exceptions, Jacksonian Democrats did indeed live up to these goals and values. Jacksonian Democrats followed some of the values of Thomas Jefferson in that they were more interested in commoners and farmers. Jacksonian Democrats kept the United States together through the 1820s and 1830s and successfully protected the rights stated in the Constitution except on the issue of Indian removal.
A major dilemma for Jackson was what to do with Native Americans living in the South and on this issue Jackson failed at protecting the rights of Native Americans. As shown in the picture, Native Americans living in the South were driven away from their lands to Oklahoma on a path known as the Trail of Tears. Did the Native Americans not have the same rights as the whites living in the South? Apparently Jackson and his successor Martin Van Buren did not ever consider this question and upon this they failed to protect the Constitution. In relation to the issue of Indian removal came another violation of the Constitution by Andrew Jackson. When John Marshall and the Supreme Court ruled that Georgia's extension of state law over Cherokee land was unconstitutional, Andrew Jackson totally ignored the decision. This action violated Supreme Court decisions and strengthened Jackson's reputation as an enemy of the law.
Politically, Jackson's domestic policy was about the people and a better government as shown through his veto of the National Bank and the institution of the Spoils system. Jackson's veto of the Bank of the United States however showed that he wanted to abide by the regulations laid out by the Constitution. In his Bank Veto message, Jackson said that the Bank was unauthorized by the Constitution

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    During the 1830’s and 1820’s the Jacksonain Democrats viewed them selves as the protectors of the Constitution from other parties who had a loose on the constitution. This statement can be viewed as both true and false as the Jacksonian Democrats did not live up to their promises. With the veto of the bank, Indian Removal Act, Jackson did little to defend the United States Constitution as promised. To add on to Jackson’s inconsistencies many of his decisions were found to have flaws that directly opposed to the Constitution. Andrew Jackson and his followers, although promised to be defenders of the Constitution, were some times anything but that.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ Jacksonian Democracy

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On the other hand, the Whigs did not support Jackson’s authority. Jackson vetoed the bank policy in 1832 because he did not agree with it as explained in doc H. He felt that since every bank across the nation would have the same policy and currency, it was thought of as a monopoly. After his unexpected veto of the policy, the people who were against him, such as the Whigs felt that he was abusing his power as the president. In Document C, the cartoon portrayed Jackson as a dictatorial king, trampling on the constitution.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ: Jacksonian Democracy

    • 764 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the 1820's and 1830's, the Jacksonian Democrats believed they were protecting many aspects of freedom for the American people and I agree with their beliefs to a limited extent. The Jacksonian Democrats were successful in maintaining the political democracy during this time. However, they were completely defeated in their attempt at establishing and preserving individual liberty. While, they were successful in some aspects of guarding the equality of economic opportunity.…

    • 764 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jacksonian Democracy DBQ

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is known that Jacksonians were strict constitutionalists and that they believed in a firm union. Although Jacksonians were definite supporters of states' rights and individuality, they were also strong nationalists. While Jacksonians strived to preserve the unifying principles that the Constitution contained, they failed to fully represent complete equality in their ways.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Andrew Jackson and his followers, the Jacksonian Democrats, viewed themselves as guardians of the United States Constitution, political democracy, individual liberty, and equality of economic opportunity. They were accurate in their perception of themselves to a great extent. Though they did not always achieve success, as in the case of political democracy and the Specie Circular, they were effective guardians of political democracy and equality of economic opportunity. However, sometimes they chose to neglect their guardianship of the Constitution and individual liberties when they dealt with people of other status or race, such as the Cherokee.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Andrew Jackson DBQ

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Second, Jackson was not democratic for economic reasons. To start, Jackson vetoed the bill to recharter the Second Bank of the United States. He claimed that he was protecting the democracy from corruption but in reality, he feared that the bankers would campaign against him. Jackson was a tyrant who destroyed the national bank for personal issues (Doc 8) and he was quoted as saying, "The Bank is trying to kill me but I will kill it." Next, Jackson passed the Indian Removal Act, which forced the Indians to move west. Even though the Indians did not want to leave their lands…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson were two influential political figures in two very different eras, ranging from 1800-1808 and 1808-1840 respectively, that established two very different political philosophies. Each formed their own system that helped shape the way people think about American government. Liberalism is a political philosophy that goes against the established status quo at the time in order for change, where as a conservative is one which adheres to principles established by that same status quo. The Jeffersonian Republicans image of the common man was one vested in the educated and independent farmer, who by no stretch of the imagine had the capabilities to serve in government. The Jacksonian Democracies image of the common man expanded from farmers to include laborers, planters, and mechanics. Jackson saw these people as the true representatives of the Government, and thus its true servers. The image of the common man for each the Jeffersonians and the Jacksonians differed in the fundamental principle of the true chosen class, and its real role in Government. Although Jeffersonian Republicanism established a more liberal status quo in comparison with the old Federalist policies, Jacksonian Democracies conservative maintenance of Jeffersons status quo did more to assist the common man in regards to the political, social, and economic aspects of his era.…

    • 1448 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson were both strong advocates of a democratic government in America, and both claimed to be for the “common man”. They did, however, have their differences on how they believed a democracy should be run in their respective eras. Even though they were both wealthy farmers, Jefferson appealed more to the upper class, while Jackson appealed more to the lower class.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Jack Dem

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Within the Jackson administration, Jacksonian Democracy impacted further advances in the political process by the “common man” and minorities, the economic stability of the nation, and created sectionalism. These impacts were caused by the end of white men voting restrictions, creation of the spoils system, vetoing of National Bank policies, distribution of currency to “pet banks,” fairness of laws for states and enforcing Indian Removal.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1829 Andrew Jackson created the Indian Removal Act. The Indian Removal Act was a law that stated that Native Americans that were settled east of the Mississippi River had to move west of the river to a portion of land that was set aside for them in the Oklahoma territory. The Cherokee Indians that were settled in Georgia became angry with the law and decided to sue the state of Georgia, because they felt like they were entitled to the land. The Supreme Court case became known as Worcester v. Georgia. It was won by the Indians and the law was proven unconstitutional. President Jackson chose to ignore the results of the case and carry on wih the law, causing the Trail of Tears. The Trail of Tears was the name given to the horrible event where Jackson force the Native Americans to travel during one of the worst winters to the other side of the Mississippi River. Jackson went against the constitution and around the verdict of the Supreme Court, so that he could get exactly what he wanted. Jackson was very unlike the presidents before him, by performing selfish deeds such as the Trail of Tears to get what he wanted.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Andrew Jackson DBQ

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When Andrew Jackson was elected in 1828, he brought about many changes in the government. Jacksonian Democrats claimed to be the "guardians of democracy", but instead they were merely guardians of their own sectional interests. In other words, they were very selfish. Despite the fact that they were selfish, they actually were able to protect political democracy and equality of economic opportunity, but they were not guardians of the constitution or individual liberty. Their main goal was not constitutional justice and individual liberty, but instead they strived to squash New England, the Whig Party, and to preserve state's rights.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Next, Jackson was not democratic for economic reasons. Jackson vetoed the bill to recharter the second bank of the united states of america. He said it was protecting the democracy from going corrupt. Jackson was hated when he destroyed the national bank for personal reasons saying "The Bank is trying to kill me but i will kill it." He soon later passed the Indian Removal Act. Which forced Indians off their land and to move West. Although Indians didnt want to go into unknown land they were forced to by Jackson. He argued that white settlers needed the land to help make the land more profitable as the Indians were not doing. Jackson was not democratic for these reasons.…

    • 345 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jacksonian Democracy

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jackson and his followers, known as “Jacksonian Democrats” became popular in the 1920s and continued as one of the stronger of the political factions in America up until the time surrounding the election of James Buchanan. Jacksonians prided themselves on upholding the Constitution, political democracy, individual liberties, and economic opportunity. Jacksonian ideals did uphold the Constitution, but their view of themselves beside that is only partially accurate. As far as political democracy and equal economic opportunity, their view of themselves was somewhat true, while they did not protect individual liberties and this view of themselves is wildly inaccurate.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Secondly, the bad if not malicious duties Jackson did during his presidency was the force removal of Native Americans from Georgia to the west and the ending the National Bank system. The state of Georgia was against the Supreme Court who was against the removal of the Natives. Even though the Supreme Court won, Georgia as well as Jackson ignored it and forced the Natives out of Georgia to the present state of Oklahoma. Many died before they even got there. As to the National Bank issue, Jackson believed that it was a monopoly towards the upper class people and as a result refuse to recharter it. Jackson used one of his vetoes, and the Bank's congressional supporters did not have enough votes to override him. The Bank ceased to exist when its charter expired in 1836, but even before that Jackson had weakened it considerably by withdrawing millions of dollars of federal…

    • 359 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Andrew Jackson a Democrat

    • 2477 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In 1829, a new kind of President elected to office was Andrew Jackson a Democrat, indeed his promises in office were to uphold the United States Constitution along with Political democracy being assured. Jackson promised individual liberty and economic opportunity. Yet, Jacksonians contradicted themselves with everything they claimed to be. Jacksonians even believed they where flawless.…

    • 2477 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays