John Locke And David Hume: The Definition Of Miracle

If you had to define the word miracle how would you define it, do you even believe miracles to be true? I know that myself surely believes in them. This whole world is too amazing not to believe. The word miracle and meaning behind it is something I have never dove deep into and have never really questioned so, after reading chapters eight and chapter nine in Faith& Reflection and seeing two different definitions of what John Locke and David Hume think a miracle is to them, I definitely have two new views on the definition of a miracle and I am very eager to share my thoughts with you. To start off, I want to be clear and state that I believe that John Locke's thoughts and beliefs on miracles could in principle, be justified. Locke not only gives his personal definitions but, he backs them up with stories and facts. Although there were parts of David Hume's that I wanted to agree with and that truly made me think, I do not believe that his definition and thoughts of a miracle could be justified and I overall do not agree with his thoughts and beliefs of a miracle.
I had grown up thinking miracles have always been God's work and to this day I believe that. So, upon reading John Locke's thoughts, facts, and definition of a miracle I was imminently drawn to him. I never have thought of the idea of miracles never really happening or never ringing true so upon reading Hume's thoughts on miracles I was almost left speechless and a little confused on my thoughts but, I knew in my heart the true meaning and understanding of the word miracle and I did not agree with Hume's