Preview

Karl Marx's Ideas Of Communism

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1102 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Karl Marx's Ideas Of Communism
Karl Marx longed for the day that he could wake up in the morning and see equality of class, equality of possessions, equality of living standards, equality of everything. By writing The Communist Manifesto, he established the ideology that could create his fantasy; Communism. Although his book achieved popularity and critical praise, there were those who saw flaws and ways to improve Marx’s first ideas of Communism. However, when Vladimir Lenin had the opportunity to make his dream a reality, he does not stray from Marx’s ideas of the poor mixing in with the rich, the cut-down of the rich and a bringing up of the poor, to create an equal class under a government which would provide everything based on the hard work of every individual together …show more content…
However, Lenin’s interpretation of some of his ideals, such as “flexible revolution.”Lenin failed to interpret that Marx meant an open door for revolution if the government corrupts, rather Lenin used the word to his own political advantage, most likely to lessen his people’s power and grow his own. Especially in his later years as leader of the Soviet Union, Lenin strayed from Marxist socialistic ideals and used much of his own ideology to run his country. “The [Russian] Revolution was successful in terms of its transfer of power from the provisional government to the vanguard Bolshevik party.”(Art of Polemics) That is to say, the Russian revolution did not produce the socialist society envisioned by Karl Marx. Instead, it was successful in giving …show more content…
For instance, the “Abolition of property in land and application of all rent of land to public purposes.” that Marx presents in the Communist manifesto, is one thing that Lenin implemented into his new Communistic society. He also implemented the monopolization of all businesses to the government and the establishment of a national monopolized bank. Marx wanted the centralization of all means of transportation and production, and Lenin did exactly that by ratifying the Supreme Council for National Economy, which would oversee the transfer of such luxuries from private to government hands. Marx recognized that wealth was spread too thinly across the proletariat and the majority of wealth resided with the bourgeois. Therefore, Lenin not only introduced universal labor duty, but also established the Red Army to enforce the taking of wealth from the wealthy and giving it to the government to redistributed to society equally. From his letters, it is clear Lenin understood many of the principles of Marxist Communism, even using Marx’s “exploitation” diction to describe the bourgeois’ role in society. However, what is beautifully worded in principle is not always efficient in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Marx and Engels wrote the Communist Manifesto to explain the history of class struggles in Europe and how communism was the ultimate form of government meant to bring equality to society and end the oppressive rule of the rising Bourgeoisie class. For Marx, humans are rational beings. But in a bourgeoisie capitalist dominated society, reality has become distorted and diminished a once functioning society. Industrialization has created a society of working class citizens who are manipulated, easily exploited, and oppressed for monetary gains. This is counterintuitive for the advancement of society and a successful government and brings about struggles of class. Therefore Marx argues the working class should be in control of government, because they are the ones ho keep the bourgeoisie rich and the economy running. “Formation of the proletariat into a class, overthrow of the bourgeois supremacy, conquest of political power by the proletariat” (Marx 14). Marx argues the average working class citizens are capable of governing the land and distributing wealth evenly amongst the people. Writing is simply not enough he calls for revolution in order to restore peace and end the impoverishment of many…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Invisible Man

    • 4262 Words
    • 18 Pages

    In The Communist Manifesto, published in 1848, was the starting point for the ideology of communism. Karl Heinrich Marx, the “Father” of communism and the most influential socialist in the 19th century, collaborated with Friedrich Engels, a friend and partner, in order to create this (adjective) work. Both socialist, Marx and Engels believed “that private property caused inequality in society and that governments should control their nation’s economy so that the basic needs of people could be satisfied.” (Lansford 14)…

    • 4262 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Communist Manifesto, written by Karl Marx is an economical and philosophical ideology that is centered on communism. Specifically, it is centered on the redistribution of wealth so that everyone in a specified nation or State is completely equal in wealth for the “betterment” of the society. This in theory eliminates the class system and as a result is intended to eliminate the oppression that comes along with the class separation and wage gap. Thankfully, for me this literary piece’s brilliance does not come simply from Marx’s economic ideals but instead it comes from the simple fact that it exists at all. What challenges me and forces me to strive towards betterment is that the Communist Manifesto serves as a reminder to me that it is…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society there is a class divide between the wealthiest one percent of the population and the poorer ninety-nine percent. Therefore, Marx believes this economic division is a result of the law reflecting the interests of the dominant class, rather than the general interests of…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx’s philosophy has been the subject of so much judgement and Scrutiny on if his beliefs will truly save the working man. The bourgeois interlocutor believe Marx’s belief would be more detrimental to the people as a whole. They believe that by wishing to abolish private property, communism will become a danger to freedom and eventual end up destroying the very base of all personal freedom, activity, and independence. Marx responds to these comments by stating that wage labor does not create any property when considering the laborers affairs. It only creates capital, a property which works only to increase the social injustice of the worker. This property called capital, is based on class antagonism. Having linked private property…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx supported the previous statement by introducing the idea of “dictatorship of the proletariat” in his book the “The Communist Manifesto”. He most probably used the word “dictatorship” to emphasize the absolute rule of only one class that will automatically destroy the other classes and therefore establish a classless society that would share the same values and interests. So as to achieve it, the bourgeoisie class needs to reach a state of “consciousness” that will free them from their desires of private property. In this way, the “dictatorship” is a form of rule that makes the government just a tool in the hands of the proletariat that is vital to free every person (regardless of class) from his needs and achieve self-satisfaction and self-fulfillment by working towards the common interests of the society, rather than an oppressive regime which suppresses personal freedom (Kolakowski 1978). Accordingly, Stalin is the framework of the Russian Communism in which center is placed the class of the Russian workers. He wanted to unite the people and destroy the differences in the society that resulted in social, economical and political conflicts: “organize the…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Depression and Fascism

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages

    * Lenin was a Marxist. He preached that private property should be abolished and that everything should be owned by everyone. He also believed that anybody making profit was abusing everybody else and that the Russian government supported a system that kept the huge majority of Russian people in misery and therefore it should be overthrown.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Commanding Heights Essay

    • 7534 Words
    • 31 Pages

    Lenin’s hardcore Communist policies were a disaster in the USSR: Food production and industrial output virtually collapsed and the county started falling apart. He had to abandon the most extreme Communist practices early on because they just didn’t work in real life.…

    • 7534 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In fact, growing opposition to these exactions was the principal development that convinced Lenin to change course in the direction of what soon became known as the new Economic Policy. V. I. Lenin, the organizer of the Russian Communist movement, viewed the Russian Empire as one political and economic whole, and almost completely ignored its national differences. As a student of Marxism, Lenin neglected the national problem and centered his attention on theorizing the capitalist development of Russia. Both as a Russian idealist and as a Marxist Utopian, Lenin failed to comprehend the inner nature of national problems and demands, viewing and solving them in accordance with the interests of the center rather than with those of the…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Antithesis Vs Communism

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Will Rogers once stated, “Communism is like prohibition; it’s a good idea but it won’t work.” Since it’s inception in mid 1800’s, Communism has been an idea that has had its ups and downs. Based on the idea of eliminating class antagonism, Communism is a synthesis of two separate entities. In a class system there exist owners and workers. Owners control the majority of the wealth and means of production. These persons were referred to as the bourgeoisie where as the workers, who only earned a small wage, were known as the proletariat. These two units can be seen as a thesis and antithesis, and by combining these two a synthesis, or in this case Communism, was created.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moreover, Marxism claimed that Russia must go through a capitalist stage before it could progress to a socialist society, which would bring Russia a step closer to communism. Nonetheless, Lenin believed that the middle classes in Russia were not strong enough to carry through a bourgeoisies-democratic revolution, which would create capitalism. The Russian bourgeoisie and middle class liberals had come onto the stage of history too late and would not play the same revolutionary role in the struggle against feudal absolutism as the French bourgeoisie. They feared the emerging working class too much. Lenin understood that if he were to live to see a communist Russia he would have to adapt Marxism, by boycotting capitalism and proceeding to an amalgamation of the bourgeoisies, and socialist revolution lead by a small group of elite revolutionaries whose purpose was to create class consciousness of workers.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Communist Manifesto

    • 513 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the reading, the communist manifesto, Marx talks about ten main points on how to turn our society into a communist society. The first point that Marx makes I do not agree with. I think that his first point means that the government can come in and take someone’s land that they own. I don’t think that anyone should be able to just randomly decide that they get to take your property away from you. I do not agree with the second point he makes either. People who are not as wealthy as others already struggle to afford things that their family needs. If the taxes heavily increase it will make it that much harder on families who already struggle. Increasing taxes not only affects the people who are considered poor but it also affects everyone else as well. The third point that Marx states I also do not agree with. If you are supposed to receive something from inheritance then you should get it. When someone passes away and leaves particular things to someone their wishes should be honored. I both agree and disagree with the fourth point that he makes. If emigrants or rebels own land and they are doing illegal things on it or with it then I believe that the land should be able to be taken away. If they are using it for good purposes like to build shelter or grow food then I believe they should be able to keep it. Marx’s fifth point I don’t believe that it would be a good idea. With a single person running a big corporation like that could make any decision they want, which can be bad. When there is a group of people who own a corporation they have to take a vote on big decisions. I believe that Marx’s sixth point can be good and bad. The state paying for transportation can be a good thing, but what happens when they run out of money? I don’t think the state could afford to pay for so many people flying on planes, or any form of transportation like that. The seventh point Marx…

    • 513 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Communist Manifesto

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Communist Manifesto was written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, as a presentation of what they believed to be an ideal Communist social and economic revolution. According to the authors, in order to avoid social oppression, every individual should be at the same level. Although Karl Marx’s and Friedrich Engels’ equal social standards beliefs could have prevented oppression of wealthier people over less wealthy ones back in time, today it could lead to an abolition of elements such as economical advantage and leading powers, because there would be no distinction of citizens based on capabilities and no opportunity for anybody to be superior to someone else.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the citizens of Russia overthrew the Tsar, they willingly and pridefully chose Vladimir Lenin as the leader of their society. The Russians assumed and believed that Lenin would grant them all of their needs and benefit Russia as a whole. Unfortunately with the long terms with Lenin being appointed, it did not work out for the better. Lenin brought about communism, famine, denied rights, and empty promises in the end. Lenin with his “unbounded power” pursued his own ideal views on what life should be like without any oppositions affecting him or opinions given by other people (Pipes 43). Therefore, Lenin and the Bolsheviks took complete power and spread communism throughout Russia. The Bolsheviks took advantage of so many people and made their own government policies. Additionally, while Lenin thought his New Economic Policy was helping and saving the country, it was still hurting many. Russians were still going through famine and starvation, even though Lenin promised, “peace, land, and bread” (Sokolskaya). Lenin also promised freedoms and rights but those were taken away and denied from citizens. When entitled rights are taken away and deprived, there will never be peace and unity within society. The country of Russia expected great change and life changing welfare, all the people received was disappointment and misery in the long…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lenin’s most important contribution is that he applied communist ideas to real life and his “experiment” forever changed the face of the world. He was a champion of the working class. Famous among his collected works are: The Development of Capitalism in Russia-The Process of the Formation of a Home Market for Large-Scale Industry (1896-99), What is to be Done?-Burning Questions of our Movement (1901-02), One Step Forward, Two Steps Back-The Crisis in our party (1904), Two Tactics of Social-Democracy in the Democratic…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays