Preview

Marxism Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
680 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Marxism Essay
Marxism Essay
While Liberalism was a philosophical system that produced capitalism as an economic system, Marxism was a reflection of the problems that existed in a capitalistic society. Therefore, Marxism was the idea behind two new economic systems, socialism and communism. Liberalism is the idea of universal human rights, equality and the protection of private property. Capitalism grew from this private ownership of capital and machines and has become the dominant economic system today. On the other hand, Marxism is a philosophic system that grew on, and intended to improve, on all of capitalisms injustices, such as lack of social justice and lack of care for the environment. Marxism suggested that social justice should be achieved through two systems that would follow each other: Socialism, where the state would play a major role in the distribution of wealth and communism, where the ultimate goal of the human race where all the injustices would be entirely eradicated.

Marxism calls for more social justice for workers. Most modern labour laws are either based in the ideas of Marxism or were taken and extended by Marxism. Things like “minimum amount of sleep for workers,” “overtime,” “public holidays,” “maternity leave” and “education and pre-qualification for workers” were all promoted as the workers basic rights. Another major idea was the collective ownership of the means of production by workers which would take the unjust advantage of capital out of the hands of capitalist and return the added value into the rightful hands. Social justice is prominent in another good idea of Marxism, the method of distribution. In Marxism, everyone gets what they need and produces what he can. Also, the government is responsible for social justice by enforcing a universal health care system, a free schooling system, massively educating the poorest. Eradication of illiteracy was one of the main goals of Marxism. Marxism suggested production that was driven by need, and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 7 D1

    • 651 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Marxism believe in different social classes having an effect on people health, the lower the class the poorer the health you have. Putting this in a perspective of life expectancy it mean that the lower the class the lower the life expectancy is probably going to be due to ill health, poverty and not being able to get the treatment that they are in need of. Therefore the better health care you can get due to the better medical equipment, the longer you are going to live. An example of this is better equipment to help cancer sufferers, due to the better care it is found that they are living 10 years longer then what they normally would.…

    • 651 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marxism is a theory which sees all society’s institutions as helping to maintain class inequality and capitalism…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marx and Engels wrote the Communist Manifesto to explain the history of class struggles in Europe and how communism was the ultimate form of government meant to bring equality to society and end the oppressive rule of the rising Bourgeoisie class. For Marx, humans are rational beings. But in a bourgeoisie capitalist dominated society, reality has become distorted and diminished a once functioning society. Industrialization has created a society of working class citizens who are manipulated, easily exploited, and oppressed for monetary gains. This is counterintuitive for the advancement of society and a successful government and brings about struggles of class. Therefore Marx argues the working class should be in control of government, because they are the ones ho keep the bourgeoisie rich and the economy running. “Formation of the proletariat into a class, overthrow of the bourgeois supremacy, conquest of political power by the proletariat” (Marx 14). Marx argues the average working class citizens are capable of governing the land and distributing wealth evenly amongst the people. Writing is simply not enough he calls for revolution in order to restore peace and end the impoverishment of many…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marxism is a useful conflict theory in helping us to understand why there was obedience, particularly in the past in society. Marx was seen as an economic determinist, as he believed that the functioning and running of society was based upon the economy. Because of this, Marx says that is why there was a divide between the proletariat (working class who have only their skills to sell) and the bourgeoisie (the ruling class who own the means of production). The bourgeoisie cannot operate without the proletariat, as they cannot produce products, and similarly the proletariat cannot operate without the bourgeoisie, as they need them so they can be paid a wage and feed their families. Therefore, even though the Bourgeoisie were exploiting the proletariat and the proletariat could have walked away to stop being exploited, they never walked away as they needed the money. On the other hand, this can be viewed from a different perspective. The reason why these people may have not left their jobs is because they could have been in a state of false consciousness, whereby they were unaware of their exploitation by the bourgeoisie. This helps us to understand society as the Marxism theory provides reasoning on how the bourgeoisie were able to exploit the proletariat, which in turn fuelled capitalism and allowed the ruling elite to maintain their profits. It is also relevant to today’s society, as it helps to explain why many people who are in a hard laboured, low paid job (e.g. Factory workers) do not leave, despite hating their job, and this is because they need the money to survive.…

    • 2098 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marxism- The Marxist theory looks at the bourgeoisie and the proletariat role in society through employment. Proletariat is the word used to determine the ‘wage-earners’ in society, and are generally the working class who have average jobs and work for somebody else. Bourgeoisie on the other hand is used to describe the people who own and run the industrial environment and work places, they are usually middle class and have the proletariat working for them because they own the means of production. Marxist believe the bourgeoisie make use of the proletariat and have both cultural and economic power over them, this then leads to class conflict. From a health point of view Marxist would say that society functions deliberately so the bourgeoisie stay in power and stay wealthy and so that the proletariat stay at working class and have no chance of building themselves up. They would also stress at the fact that the bourgeoisie’s power if ascribed and certainly not achieved, because how can it be achieved if the proletariat are not able to build themselves up how can they end up being in power. They say the NHS should be accessible to anyone and everyone and no matter what class you fall under healthcare should not be not available to anyone. Marxist also believe that whether you are proletariat or bourgeoisie, the amount you earn and your ability to pay should not determined whether or not you can have access to health care and medication and that equality is wrong and everyone should be aloud the same opportunities.…

    • 659 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Karl Marx, the struggle between the upper class, the bourgeoisie and the lower class, the proletariat, has always been a constant conflict throughout history. The bourgeoisie controlled all means of production and continuously oppressed the proletariat, which was unfair because the proletariats were the ones doing hard labor, yet the bourgeoisie gained all of the benefits. Marx believed that in order to end this class struggle, class distinctions would need to be eliminated. In order for everybody in society to be considered equal, there could be no private ownership of materials. If private ownership of materials were allowed, then some people would have more things than other people which would create another class and thus another conflict. Therefore, an equalized society would get rid of all conflict. Marxism has been…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Liberalism is the model of analysis in international relations stressing the capacity of states to coexist and interact peacefully and harmoniously. Socialism is the ideology that argues that citizens are best served by policies focusing on meeting the basic needs of the entire society rather than by policies focusing on serving the needs of individuals as individuals. The difference between the two is that liberalism is a belief that the government should only minorly interfere within the daily lives of its citizens and that socialism will assure an equal distribution of wealth and goods to the population.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    fascist essay

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To what extent does disappointment with the outcome of the first world war explain growing support for the Italian fascist party in the years 1919-1922?…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although they both advocate for the separation of church and state, both ideologies differ on the other aspects of human social organization. The distinction between the two is a result of their economic philosophy. Liberalism, since it argues for individual rights, works perfect with capitalism because capitalism too relies on individual rights and property rights to function. On the other hand, Socialism reacts to capitalism and liberalism by pushing for a more equalitarian society. Socialism views the world through economic inequality, which leads it to conclude that inequality effectively hurts the majority. The good for the majority ideology, leads Socialism to push for collective human rights with the idea that property rights cannot universal rights because property is not properly available to all. The differences between the two are extremely important because they have led to critical observations and changes on the way humanity shapes its…

    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The World State is a seemingly perfect place. There people are “decanted” and then conditioned to fit perfectly into a preselected social caste. Because of the conditioning they are put through, everyone is happy in the caste they are put in. The feelings of despair and suffering are absent from this world, at the price of religion, art, and open scientific discoveries. While from the surface the World State seems like an utopia in the novel Brave New World, Aldous Huxley expresses his clear distaste for the state through the character John as he criticizes the ways of the World State’s society once he’s introduced to the different aspects of it, Bernard Marx as he criticizes the World State as he doesn’t fit in in it, and Helmholtz as he struggles…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout time, rulers and controlling governments have used the ideas of Marxism to take and maintain control over the working class. Even today ideas such as classism and commodification are used in countries such as North Korea and Syria to help governments rule over their citizens. In George Orwell’s 1984 the ideas of Marxism are used to oppress proletariats. The Party tricks the citizens of Oceania into thinking that their propaganda benefits the working class, classism is used as a means of allowing the Party and its associates more power and control than the average citizen, and people under the Party’s rule are commoditized physically and psychologically so as to not questions their totalitarian government.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Progressivism Essay

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Though the progressives were successful in several areas, exposing corruption was their greatest success. The results of this led to the revealing frauds, unfair business practices, bribery, and many other unlawful practices. Because the progressives had exposed so much corruption, average citizens would soon have the benefit of cleaner work conditions, higher wages, less voter intimidation, and safer goods for sale.…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    marxist aproach

    • 644 Words
    • 2 Pages

    From a Marxist perspective, would you argue that globalisation mitigates or deepens global inequality? Explain why.…

    • 644 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Some similarities between Marxism and Socialism is that Marxism theory is derived directly from Socialism. For example, both Ideology believe that there should be no class classifications, but in order to achieve this, the proletariat must overthrow the dictators and replace them with the proletariat in order to have "lasting peace" and for the first time, "genuine freedom."(1)…

    • 1572 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marxism shares in common with functionalism the macro structural approach to society, looking at it as a whole, however a key difference between the two theories is that marxism is a conflict perspective, that is the conflict of class between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat also known as the ruling and working classes. The work of Karl Marx in the mid 1800s constitutes the main body of this conflict theory, he wrote that the central institution of capitalist society is private property, the system by which capital (money, machines, factories and other material objects) is controlled by a small minority of the population, leading to opposed classes i.e. the bourgeoisie and the proletariat (Cohen 1978). Marxists believe that society is based on ascribed status which is given by birth or family background, therefore the bourgeoisie pass down their land and properties to their children, keeping the wealth in the…

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays