Preview

Montesquieu - "The Persian Letters" - The Parable of the Troglodytes and Its Relation to Forming a Government

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1756 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Montesquieu - "The Persian Letters" - The Parable of the Troglodytes and Its Relation to Forming a Government
The "Persian Letters" (Letters XI - XIV) illustrate a classic question in philosophical thought: is man meant to live life by desire or virtue, and what happens if either case is taken to an extreme. Montesquieu illustrates this in letters written by Usbek to Mirza, and a story of a clan of Troglodytes who have created a city (so to speak) first ruled by their own desires as individuals (or their own selfish desires) and then through time, come to live by virtue, and later an attempt at the formation of a government - where the story ends.

The story can roughly be divided into three parts - as it spans four letters: 1) Letter XI illustrates the Troglodytes living by their desires, 2) Letters XII and XII focus on the Troglodytes living by virtues, and 3) Letter XIV demonstrates the Troglodytes difficulty in forming a government.

The story as a whole is a fable, with Montesquieu pointing out in the first part that men should not live by their desire. The Troglodytes are depicted as humans decedent from animals, and "were so wicked and so ferocious that there existed among them no principle of equity and justice." They were once ruled by a king who sought to abandon them of their wicked ways, but they soon killed him off, denouncing all government, and living by selfish whims. They soon fall prey to what Hobbes and Locke describe as a state of nature, where basically only the strongest survived. And through their "cupidity" they soon all fall prey to each other in one way or another: wives are stolen, as well as land, and material possessions. Even ties to neighboring countries are cut off; when a mysterious illness plagues their lands a foreign doctor arrives and cures them, but is refused payment or retribution for his services, and when the illness strikes again the doctor declines their requests for help based on their previous behavior towards him. And Montesquieu concludes the fate of the Troglodytes that live in a world of desire, by describing them as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Rose For Emily

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages

    2. Trace the timeline of this story, and then analyze why the author decided to recount the tale in this…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles-Louis de Secondat, the Baron de Montesquieu was one of the greatest intellectuals in the Enlightenment Era. He had many good ideas about the world and how it works I say this because of his ideas of separation of power. Separation of power is when the executive, legislative and judicial powers of the government limit and control each other in a checks and balances system. Because each branch prevents the other from gaining too much power The state will have lasting freedom and strength. Our country has used this principle for the past 200 years, and we have remained strong. We have had no major rebellion against our leaders, save one, and we have remained a militarily and economically powerful country. And that is why I agree with…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The argument presented by Thomas Hobbes in chapter 13 of Leviathan, is that the state of nature is a state of war of all against all. Such a view had previously been discussed- earlier versions of the argument appear in other significant works- however it is Hobbes account of a state in “continuall feare of danger and violent death”1 upon which I will focus on and critique in this essay. There are many reasons why many seem to regard Hobbes argument as the most accurate portrayal of a pre-civilised society, many believe it to be so straightforward and seemingly correct that to object it would be to ignore a necessary truth. Secondly, those who accept Hobbes’ view of a human nature that is so egotistical and unforgiving, would seemingly too agree to the assumption of a gloomy, unbearable state of nature. In this essay I shall argue that such opinions are not logically justified as Hobbes’s argument holds its foundations solidly in assumption alone, an assumption that was heavily moulded on his surroundings of a savage Civil War. Hobbes’s argument lies solely on the grounds that human beings are intrinsically wicked and self-centred beings an argument that cannot be completely validated and therefore cannot be a ‘necessary truth’. Yet despite holding such a bleak outlook on the human condition and its simple invalidity the work of Thomas Hobbes still shapes the political word today2 and it continues to impact our understanding of human nature and interactions. In order to justify my critique of Hobbes I will begin by presenting both his original argument and a brief view of some modern interpretations before cross examining their conclusions against that of other social contract theorist such as Locke and Rousseau as well as rational logic to present the argument that the state of nature is most certainly not a state of war of all against all.…

    • 3361 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chrysalids Theme Analysis

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Summary: Three types of conflicts serve as themes in the novel Chrysalids: Person versus Self, Person versus Society, and Person versus Person.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democritus was a Greek Philosopher born 460 B.C. in the city of Abdera, and died 370 B.C. He was born into a wealthy family and traveled the world extensively. He was known as the “laughing” philosopher, or the “happy” philosopher because he would constantly mock people, and laugh incessantly about his own jibes. Throughout his life he wrote over 70 books, however very few pages have survived the years. Some have said that Democritus blinded himself to better understand his own mind,however, because he had over 70 writings these conceptions of Democritus have been discredited. Democritus studied natural philosophy under his mentor Leucippus, who had a huge affect on Democritus's writings and publications as they were very similar to Leucippus own theories. It is difficult to distinguish whose theories belonged to who because very few documents have survived. However Democritus has been credited with most of them. His major contributions to science is his atomic theory,which was the basis on which modern atomic theory was developed.(http://www.iep.utm.edu/democrit/)…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Creon, the King of Thebes, and Bernarda, who is the head of her household are the most powerful characters in their plays. Both characters want to have complete control over everything and everyone around them; however both suffer losses as a result of their attitudes and use of power. The main difference between Creon and Bernarda is how they react to these losses and to the challenges to their authority. It is this aspect which the essay will explore.…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The practice of leaving offerings for the Gods was common in Greek religion, offerings could be left at the temple of a certain God in order to gain their favor, or in gratitude for successes which could be attributed to that God. The size and grandeur of the offerings differed drastically among social classes, the poorer classes often offering only small terracotta figures of animals in place of an actual blood sacrifice. The physical objects left behind can be highly revealing of the society at the time, and when supplemented with literary sources, they become even more informative.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The three main characters in the book are all faced with an adversity of some kind. However, their responses to adversity are contrasting. Timber and Dr. Ganderbai act with a sense of helpfulness and…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Que sais-je?” French for “What do I know?” is the beloved motto of French essayist Michel De Montaigne. Initial readings of Montaigne’s essays appear to be oriented toward self rather than incorporating any communal tones. Yet, close readings reveal this motto is directed collectively towards a Renaissance society. Montaigne, in his essays “On Cannibalism” and “On Cruelty,” is communally asking a European society “what do we know?” by displaying contradictory and arcane aspects of European culture, and presenting parallels of Western society with other “savage” non-European people. However, when reading Montaigne’s essays a question comes to mind: to what end does Montaigne hope to achieve by exposing such disagreeable aspects of European culture? Is he attempting to reform European practices of colonization and ideals of virtue through exposing an immoral nature?…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Satire In Tartuffe

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Tartuffe has fooled nobody but Orgon – the man who has the power and wealth in this situation. The characters in this play all play a certain role in the plot. Elmire, Orgon's wife, presents a reasonable attitude towards life and the situation. She was the only one able to convince Orgon to see for himself that Tartuffe was a hypocrite. She wants nothing but to save her husband from Tartuffe's control. Damis, Orgon's son, is the unlucky soul to take the blame for his father's misjudgment of Tartuffe. In trying to help his father, he loses his trust and his ties to him. He wants to keep Tartuffe away from his family, but the only thing he succeeds in doing is losing his inheritance. Mariane is the lovely daughter, who is going to be forced to marry a man she does not love or even like. She is part of Orgon's plan to make Tartuffe a member of the household, whether she likes it or not. She just wants to marry the man she loves. Cleante is Orgon's brother-in law. He tries to get everyone to view the situation with calm and reason. He wants the best for Orgon and his family. Tartuffe is the imposter who weasels his way into Orgon's inheritance and then betrays him. He is only looking for the money and is a very greedy man. Orgon is the central character that comes under the influence of Tartuffe. His only want seems to be to make Tartuffe an ally to his house. He is blind to the real situation and seems to have no common sense and no trust in his family and what they are telling him. He is duped by Tartuffe, and is only saved by those he would not listen to before. He is a complex man who makes the story what it…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes Vs Machiavelli

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page

    Lastly, both Hobbes and Machiavelli agree in their opinion of man what is one that is very negative. In the novel The Prince, Machiavelli states that men are “ungrateful, fickle, deceptive, and deceiving, avoiders of danger, eager to gain” (Machiavelli < 1542 > 2006). Similarly, in the novel Leviathan, Hobbes states how the life of a man is “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short” (Hobbes < 1651 > 2009). This shows how both Machiavelli and Hobbes see men and their lives as very negative aspects, but differ in what there perspectives are of it. Machiavelli explains how men are unreliable and not worth trusting when Hobbes is explaining how life naturally is terrible and without sovereignty, life and man are nothing.…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thesis-For some reason or another, nearly everyone to walk this planet has craved power. From early peoples trying to earn the highest rank of their tribe to the conquests of territories to even the pursuit of the top job in a company today, human beings need to be the cream of the crop. No matter where in the world, there’s always a Julius Caesar or Donald Trump kind of person. In a lot of instances, these types of people end up with a wealth of success, but it always comes with a cost: they expose who they really are, for better or worse. In Antigone, a tragic play by Sophocles that takes place in Greece in around 441 B.C., a man named Creon takes over as king of Thebes after the exile of his brother in-law and former king,…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of human nature has changed over time in many aspects, but throughout history and literature, self-interest has stayed as a foremost motivation in human actions, thoughts, and mannerisms. Needs to gain more power, more land, or more substance has caused people of all times and cultures to use forms of acquisition to quell these thirsts. Even at different times in history, this idea of selfish satisfaction proves true. As evidenced through literature in different time periods, authors show self-motivation through their characters.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    She includes the Persian Empire in her book because they had military and economic strength. They were skilled in using the strengths of the people they conquered to succeed.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judith Beveridge

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “The Two Brother” is a poem which uses natural speech rhythms, tone and informal language is used to create an understanding with the reader. Reader is shown the brother’s cruelty but is also shown their brittleness and insecurity. The brothers’ cruelty is connected with their gender. This is shown in line 3-5 which says, “Had shown me themselves, grinning queerly as when they’d shown me lizards they’d killed, or sparrows they’d slowly bled with a needle.” These lines show vivid and disturbing images of boys’ violence, this is then enhanced by alliteration of the word ‘S’ in “sparrows they’d slowly bled.” In the lines, “shown me themselves” implies that such violence is a characteristic of being a male in our society. This idea of cruelty being a part of male’s characteristic in our society is shown again in line 13 which says, “Would dare each other any taste, any soft clot, any ugly act.” This line tells the reader that the brother’s would do anything and challenge each other for dominance which also implies that these characteristics of challenging each other for dominance is a part of a male’s life. In the last stanza the reader is given the idea that the brothers haven’t achieved anything and that the reader should feel pity for the brothers rather than looking at them as wrong, heartless human beings. This is shown by persona saying “Touched themselves through the emptiness of their pockets, scared they’d find the prize of nothing.” This quote evokes sympathy for the brothers through the word choice “emptiness” and “prize of nothing”.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays