Preview

Napoleon Trial

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1117 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Napoleon Trial
The Trial of Napoleon Bonaparte:
Hero or Tyrant?
Prosecution- opening statement: o “I will prove that Napoleon is guilty of crimes against the people of France, Russia, and Austria.” –Nathan Kravitz o “Napoleon is a well known man but also a well known dictator. He took France out of a constitutional monarchy and called himself emperor.” –Courtney Barnes o “I can prove that he is bad based on testimonies of the French and the British” –Armando Delgado o “From what I have seen and heard thus far is that Napoleon has killed not only his people but others people. What right does he have to do this? Why?”

Cross examination- opening statement: o “Ladies and gentleman, I stand before you today to defend a man who brought stability to his people in a time of chaos. Napoleon Bonaparte most certainly did not want to return France to the ancient Regime, but instead came to power promising the phold of both revolutionary principles and much needed social order. The French were unstable and needed someone who was willing to lead their country, unite them, and bring order to society, and Bonaparte emerged to become that very man by creating a legendary domestic system that modified French society, a sense of nationalism, and identity nothing like the French had ever seen before, and warfare experience with keen sense of tactics revolutionizing military then and years to come leading France to become a dominant nation.” –Mimi Berri o “I intend to prove that Napoleon is in fact a great man and a hero to many based on his great military skills that brought multiple victories to France.” Emma Barker o “I will prove that Napoleon is not guilty from a loyal French soldier named Francois, who worked with Napoleon and benefitted from him. He will tell his story on how Napoleon treated him and how he was a hero to his country.” –Vincent Ladislao o “Napoleon is not guilty. He changed the education system. Not only the privileged were allowed to go. He became emperor and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    misconduct to the country of France, I can safely say that Napoleon has been proven…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Napoleon the kingmaker." History Today, vol. 48, no. 3, 1998, p. 39+. Biography in Context,…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    |the history of the French Revolution, his mind was not a blank, it was full of…

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Napoleon Bonaparte is a well known political leader of the modern world. His conquests into other European countries and his military knowledge make him the historical legend that he has come to be. He made himself emperor of France and ended the French Revolution. Bonaparte’s successes in France cause him to be revered as a great leader who exemplifies Niccolò Machiavelli’s beliefs regarding the leadership of a country. Machiavelli offers advice to political leaders in his novel, The Prince, which is proven relevant through Napoleon’s ability to be war-minded, feared, and a good leader.…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To most of Europe, Napoleon was just another conqueror trying to expand his territories, but to the people of France, he was a great leader; he “restored peace and order at home” (Kagan, Ozment, Turner, Frank 586). Restoring order to France was one of his greatest domestic achievements; the people loved him for his support in helping them win their fight for equal rights “to achieve wealth, status, and security for their property” (Kagan, Ozment, Turner, Frank 586).…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Napoleon limited who had power and rights in society in a few ways. Napoleon created the Napoleonic Code, which guaranteed everyone equal rights except for women and black people. Because of the code, it was controlled who had rights. Also, Napoleon created schools for boys ages ten to sixteen, called lycees. While many people saw…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    shows that the Reign of Terror was not justified by the threats to the French government…

    • 666 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: Smitha, Frank. "Napoleon 's Wars, Mistakes and Fall." fsmitha.com. Frank E. Smitha, n.d. Web. 17 Apr…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our country had the opportunity to chose a new leader with the downfall of King Louis XVI’s reign. An alleged leader by the name of Napoleon Bonaparte comes along and seems to be a hero in the eyes of the public because we had just won the war against Austria under his command. With the rise of this man, our country is supposedly at its peak. Although some people may argue that he holds plebiscites, he views order higher than liberty and recently reinstated slavery.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I, Napoleon Bonaparte, have finally succeeded! I have become the new strong leader of France. Thanks to the Revolution, I advanced from the position of lieutenant in the artillery to a full-fledged general, which changed my life entirely and gave me a world full of power. I am known to be our nation's savior and am treated as a hero to everyone. Yes, I know people do not like dictatorship and a complete ruler over the whole, but I am going to be a dictator with the utmost power. But I am not that foolish to be so obvious. I will hold a referendum in which all French men can vote to either approve or disapprove of my new regime. I am sure almost all would accept my power since, who with brains would really go against such a man as me already treated a hero by the majority? They dare not...…

    • 526 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Like many revolutionaries, Napoleon and Lafayette were both beloved by their followers and were forever praised for their accomplishments. There were different angles taken by each individual to reach their goal. As we find out in Lafayette in Two Worlds by Lloyd Kramer, Lafayette’s influence on America and how his legacy in both the American and French revolutions assisted one another to make him a important figure in both societies. In Felix Markham’s Napoleon, Napoleon is a revolutionary at heart, beginning in his childhood days. He wants the fame and power of a revolution and achieves it by climbing up the political ladder. It is important to understand that while both Lafayette and Napoleon contributed to the revolution, that the way they went about donating to the cause was in their own individual manor. This potentially can skew people’s view of how revolutionary each individual was.…

    • 2483 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Napoleon Bonaparte

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Napoleon Bonaparte was an excellent leader whose command of his soldiers is legendary. His early schooling at a French military academy taught him strategies to become a brilliant military leader. Many of Napoleon’s positive childhood habits persisted throughout his life. On the other hand, some of the destructive characteristics continued through his ruling and ultimately led to his downfall.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Napoleon Bonaparte

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Napoleon Bonaparte was a military and political leader of France who made significant mistakes leading him to his downfall. Napoleon was a man obsessed with power and wealth. He was well known for his genius abilities of leading a full army, and winning impossible battles. Napoleon felt confident and believed he was more powerful than ever. But every single one of his accomplishments led him to wanting more, which is when everything began to go wrong. He made choices that were no good to France and it’s citizens. Napoleon’s three main errors will be explained in the following essay.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Hard power is a term used to describe power that is acquired from the use of military and/or economic force to influence the behaviour or interests of other political entities. As the name might imply, this type of political power is often aggressive, and is most effective when imposed by one political body upon another of lesser military and/or economic power. What it boils down to is: Do what we want. If you don 't, we will inflict undesirable damage on your person, citizenry, economy, security forces, crops, well water, et cetera. Hard power is mostly placed in the International Relations field of Realism, where military power is seen as the expression of a state’s strength in the international community. While the existence of hard power has a long history, the term arose when Joseph Nye coined 'soft power ' as a fresh and different form of power in a State 's foreign policy. Nye defined soft power as “the ability to get what you want through attraction rather than through coercion.” He also said that soft power “could be developed through relations with allies, economic assistance, and cultural exchanges.” He argued that this would result in “a more favourable public opinion and credibility abroad.” By engaging both forms of power, hard and soft, one is then employing ‘smart power’. Another term defined by Joseph Nye, it was endorsed by Hilary Clinton:…

    • 3218 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    lsfj;odsjf

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Good morning your honour , ladies and gentlemen of the Jury, my name is Amarjit Sidhu, and with the help of my colleagues Nurije Rustemi, and Hufsa Khan it is an honour to represent our client, Mr. Napoleon Bonaparte in this case before you today. You have heard the prosecution's assumption that my client is guilty, disregarding the fact that the so claimed eye witnesses, have a negative bias towards Mr. Bonaparte and are here on the ill terms of hateful revenge. The alleged charges of crimes against humanity the prosecution brings forth to you today, are fabricated to draw the impression that Mr. Bonaparte single handily harmed his French citizens, when really he allowed them to flourish. Mr. Bonaparte continued the development of infrastructure within France which aided trade, encouraged the development of industry through tariffs against foreign goods and subsidies, and loans to French businesses, he reformed the currency establishing the Bank of France, created the Napoleonic code, a uniform legal code which regularized commercial practices, and reformed the systems of weights which facilitated trade by simplifying both internal and cross border trade. Sitting before you today is an enlightened, philosophical, and strategic political leader, but we are forgetting one crucial detail, we are not dealing with an animal but rather a human being, and much like you citizens of the courtroom he is not only a man but a father, with a loving wife and children of which he confides to each and every day. This man is capable of bringing into his home, Hortense and Eugene, two children and treating them much like his own, being a father to them like no other, holding a deep devotion to his children. How might one rip a father away from his children? Instilling an innocent man with the pain and anguish of being torn away from his family, and loved ones, ladies and gentlemen my client, Mr. Bonaparte is innocent. Finally I would like to implore all of you , present…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays