Preview

One of the main assumptions of Marxism : Contradiction and Conflict.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
455 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
One of the main assumptions of Marxism : Contradiction and Conflict.
The theory of Marxism is a fundamental alternative to functionalism. It was largely used and appreciated during the 1970s, due to the decline of functionalism and the assurance that it could offer answers which functionalism could not provide. Also, Marxism was more in sync with that era. It takes its name from the German philosopher who created its assumptions, Karl Marx (1818-1883). Marx derived his main assumptions with the help of his close ally and compatriot, Friedrich Engels. The following report is a simplified story of one of the assumptions of the Marxist perspective : Contradiction and Conflict.

CONTRADICTION AND CONFLICT

The main premise of Marxism is Economics. This theory begins with the observation that, in order to continue to exist, humans must produce food and material possessions. In order to carry out production, social beings enter into relationships with each other. The size, modernization or state of a society does not matter. Whether it is a large industrialized society or a small hunting village, every civilization needs successful production in order to survive; it is a social enterprise. In order for production to be successful, it must involve a methodological factor known as forces of production, which consists of the technology, scientific knowledge and raw materials employed in the course of production.

Each major phase in the progress of the forces of production will keep up a correspondence with a particular type of the social relationships of production. For instance, the forces of production in a hunting / gathering society will correspond with a certain set of social relationships. When placed together, the forces of production and the social relationships of production form the economic foundation or infrastructure of society. The other portion of society, which is the superstructure, is produced by the infrastructure. In a nutshell, the political, didactic and legal institutions and the ethical and belief systems are chiefly

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marxism is the political and economical theories of Karl Marx, which later developed into the basis for communism…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marxism is a theory which sees all society’s institutions as helping to maintain class inequality and capitalism…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxism states that the power in society lies with the people who have more money or…

    • 2664 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marxism is a useful conflict theory in helping us to understand why there was obedience, particularly in the past in society. Marx was seen as an economic determinist, as he believed that the functioning and running of society was based upon the economy. Because of this, Marx says that is why there was a divide between the proletariat (working class who have only their skills to sell) and the bourgeoisie (the ruling class who own the means of production). The bourgeoisie cannot operate without the proletariat, as they cannot produce products, and similarly the proletariat cannot operate without the bourgeoisie, as they need them so they can be paid a wage and feed their families. Therefore, even though the Bourgeoisie were exploiting the proletariat and the proletariat could have walked away to stop being exploited, they never walked away as they needed the money. On the other hand, this can be viewed from a different perspective. The reason why these people may have not left their jobs is because they could have been in a state of false consciousness, whereby they were unaware of their exploitation by the bourgeoisie. This helps us to understand society as the Marxism theory provides reasoning on how the bourgeoisie were able to exploit the proletariat, which in turn fuelled capitalism and allowed the ruling elite to maintain their profits. It is also relevant to today’s society, as it helps to explain why many people who are in a hard laboured, low paid job (e.g. Factory workers) do not leave, despite hating their job, and this is because they need the money to survive.…

    • 2098 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Founded by Karl Marx, Marxism is a school of thought which explores the relationship between the upper and lower classes of society. It was taught through Marxism that the main cause for historical change was disputes between social classes. This social warfare stemmed from the belief that the state, or government, for as long as it has existed, has used its authority to oppress the working masses for the benefit of the wealthy few. The relationship between the proletariats, the working class, and the bourgeoisie, the rich, was posited as one of opposition and conflict. Marx believed that a successful capitalist-run society was impossible and doomed to fail.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marxism is a worldview and method of societal analysis that focuses on class relations and societal conflict. Marxist sociologists believe that economics are what determines society. These include things like: politics, religion, law and culture. Basically they think that the way goods are made and distributed determines the ways…

    • 601 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In sociology, Marxism explains social change and movements. Developed by Karl Marx in the mid-1800s, Marxism holds that in a capitalist society the owners of the means of production oppress those who work in them. For example, the people who own large corporations exploit corporate employees, who perform unrewarding work for little pay. Resulting class conflict leads to social change in the form of revolution, as the workers overthrow the ruling class. In general, social change arises from class conflict. Marx thought classes would disappear in a communist…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxism is a conflict model, as it suggests that the functionalist theory is not true, and instead that social stratification and class is used as a way of exploiting workers – the hard workers in society are not working towards the greater good of all, but instead they work purely to benefit their employers, as a form of social control by forcing individuals to conform to the norms of society through their need to earn money. It also highlights the problems many people face in society, in terms of social mobility, as it suggests that because of the fact that individuals work for the benefit of the higher classes, they are unable to support themselves in moving up the hierarchy of…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    essay

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages

    .To fully understand Communism we must first analyze where it came from. Communsim was developed from the ideas of Karl Marx. These ideas are what we know today as Marxism. Marxism can be viewed as a response to the disclocations and suffering of the working class in the early stages of the industrail revolution in Great Britian and Western Europe (Fainsod). This can be summed up as a theory in which class struggle is the most important element in the analysis of change in Wetern societies. We have seen such actions happen…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marxism is an ideology based on the economic and political theories of Karl Marx and Freidrich Engels. Karl Marx who was born in Germany in 1818 was a revolutionary whose ideas on society were the foundation of communism. Under modern capitalism the means of production, such as factories, land, and technology are controlled by a small minority who Marx called the bourgeoisie. Production is carried out by the working class, known as the proletarians who have to sell their labour or face poverty or starvation. Taken together these two classes form the economic base of society, what Marx called the substructure. Marx saw that there was conflict between these two divisions and that this could only be resolved by a revolution, which would lead to a classless society, where the means of production would be held collectively. All Marx’s theories use social class as a starting point for analysis. In this essay we will explore two areas where Marx’s theories have had influence, crime and deviance and education. Marx saw the bourgeoisie as controlling these institutions. Marxists believe that these institutions form part of the superstructure of society with the economy as its base.…

    • 1931 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    While both the functionalist and the symbolic interactionist perspectives focused on the positive aspects of society that contributes to its stability, the conflict perspective focused on the negative, conflicted, and ever changing nature of society (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2014). The general underlying assumption associated with the conflict theory is that society is made up of groups with competing self-interests. Marx termed these groups as the classes of people where they fell into two distinct categories; The Capitalists/Ruling Class and the Proletariat/Working Class. The Capitalists/Ruling Class were those who consisted of a small group that owned the capital or means of production and also had a position of power. The Proletariat/Working Class were those who consisted of a large group that possessed labour and provided the labour for the means of production, however they lacked power (Giddens, 2008).…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sociological Perspectives

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Marxism views the appearance of consensus as nothing more than an imitation. It has the purpose of concealing the reality of the capitalist class and determining the shape of the superstructure by imposing its will upon the working class. It exploits this part of society for profit, supporting the belief that the law is selective in its deliverance of punishment.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    sociological perspectives

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Marxism: An economic, social, and political philosophy based on ideas that view social change in terms of economic factors. Developed in the 19th century by Karl Marx (1818-1883). Marxism says that people in the world are organized into different classes based on their relationship to how things are made. Most people are called "workers" because they work in factories or offices or farms for money. They belong to the "working class" (or "proletariat"). Another group, who are not as big as the working class are "capitalists", because they own the factories, land and buildings that the workers have to work in and also own all of the tools the workers have to use. This is called “the ruling class”. Is a macro perspective.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Conflict theory focuses on the sharing of resources such as power and views social life as a competition.…

    • 113 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marxism shares in common with functionalism the macro structural approach to society, looking at it as a whole, however a key difference between the two theories is that marxism is a conflict perspective, that is the conflict of class between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat also known as the ruling and working classes. The work of Karl Marx in the mid 1800s constitutes the main body of this conflict theory, he wrote that the central institution of capitalist society is private property, the system by which capital (money, machines, factories and other material objects) is controlled by a small minority of the population, leading to opposed classes i.e. the bourgeoisie and the proletariat (Cohen 1978). Marxists believe that society is based on ascribed status which is given by birth or family background, therefore the bourgeoisie pass down their land and properties to their children, keeping the wealth in the…

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics