Preview

Socrate's Conviction

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1666 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Socrate's Conviction
Socrates’ Conviction
Was Socrates guilty of the charges brought against him? Does his trial and execution represent the effective functioning of the Athenian democracy, or a failure of it?
Why, in a society relishing freedom and democracy, would a seventy-year-old philosopher be executed for what he was teaching? What could Socrates have done to prompt a jury of 500 Athenians send him to his death just a few years before he would have died naturally? He was charged with not believing in the gods worshipped by the city, introducing new divinities and for corrupting the youth. Socrates was a freethinker who went around Athens probing his fellow Athenians with questions and dialectal interrogations about religion and politics. He held contemporary views, that when he expressed them, provoked his listeners to anger. In 423 B.C., Socrates produced a play called Clouds, which at the time proved to be no threat to Athenian values and democracy. Characters in the play were taught how strengthen weak arguments by learning rhetorical skills and trickery and innovative divinities were introduced. However in 399 B.C., Socrates was charged with impiety. This was not the only charge brought against this philosopher; he was also accused for corrupting adolescences, Alcibiades and Critias. Should he have been condemned to death over such charges? Although religion and the state were central to ancient Athenian law, Socrates was executed unjustly.
Socrates’ reputation among his fellow citizens suffered greatly during two periods when Athenian democracy was temporarily overthrown; one four month period from 411-410 B.C. and a longer period from 404-403 B.C. The key forces in both of the anti-democratic movements were former pupils of Socrates, Alcibiades and Critias. Athenians considered the teachings of Socrates, especially his expression of contempt toward the established constitution, partly responsible for the resulting death and suffering. Alcibiades



Cited: Kagan, Donald, and Gregory Viggiano. "Was Socrates Guilty?" Problems in the History of Ancient Greece: Sources and Interpretation. Boston: Prentice Hall, 2010. N. pag. Print. Linder, Douglas. "The Trial of Socrates." Social Science Research Network. University of Missouri, 2002. Web. 25 Apr. 2013. Pomeroy, Sarah B. Ancient Greece: A Political, Social, and Cultural History. New York: Oxford UP, 1999. 360-64. Print. [ 2 ]. Kagan, Donald, and Gregory Viggiano. "Was Socrates Guilty?" Problems in the History of Ancient Greece: Sources and Interpretation. Boston: Prentice Hall, 2010. N. pag. Print. [ 3 ]. Pomeroy, Sarah B. "Alcibiades, Renegade Aristocrat." Ancient Greece: A Political, Social, and Cultural History. New York: Oxford UP, 1999. 341-57. Print. [ 4 ]. Pomeroy, Sarah B. "Alcibiades, Renegade Aristocrat." Ancient Greece: A Political, Social, and Cultural History. New York: Oxford UP, 1999. 341-57. Print. [ 5 ]. Linder, Douglas. "The Trial of Socrates." Social Science Research Network. University of Missouri, 2002. Web. 25 Apr. 2013. [ 6 ]. Kagan, Donald, and Gregory Viggiano. "Was Socrates Guilty?" Problems in the History of Ancient Greece: Sources and Interpretation. Boston: Prentice Hall, 2010. N. pag. Print. [ 7 ]. Linder, Douglas. "The Trial of Socrates." Social Science Research Network. University of Missouri, 2002. Web. 25 Apr. 2013. [ 8 ]. Linder, Douglas. "The Trial of Socrates." Social Science Research Network. University of Missouri, 2002. Web. 25 Apr. 2013. [ 9 ]. Kagan, Donald, and Gregory Viggiano. "Was Socrates Guilty?" Problems in the History of Ancient Greece: Sources and Interpretation. Boston: Prentice Hall, 2010. N. pag. Print. [ 10 ]. Kagan, Donald, and Gregory Viggiano. "Was Socrates Guilty?" Problems in the History of Ancient Greece: Sources and Interpretation. Boston: Prentice Hall, 2010. N. pag. Print. [ 11 ]. Pomeroy, Sarah B. "The Trial of Socrates(399 B.C.)." Ancient Greece: A Political, Social, and Cultural History. New York: Oxford UP, 1999. 360-64. Print. [ 12 ]. Kagan, Donald, and Gregory Viggiano. "Was Socrates Guilty?" Problems in the History of Ancient Greece: Sources and Interpretation. Boston: Prentice Hall, 2010. N. pag. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In the Crito, Plato introduces several arguments that Socrates makes on whether or not it would be just for him to escape from prison when the Athenians have not acquitted him. Socrates begins by arguing that one must never do wrong. One of the most compelling arguments that he goes on to make is that doing harm to someone is wrong and therefore one must never engage in retaliatory harm. Under certain circumstances, such as self-defense, retaliatory harm is necessary. Socrates also argues that whenever you violate an agreement, you harm the person you made the agreement with. Therefore, escaping is wrong. In this paper, I shall argue that although the arguments support…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    For these two articles that we read in Crito and Apology by Plato, we could know Socrates is an enduring person with imagination, because he presents us with a mass of contradictions: Most eloquent men, yet he never wrote a word; ugliest yet most profoundly attractive; ignorant yet wise; wrongfully convicted, yet unwilling to avoid his unjust execution. Behind these conundrums is a contradiction less often explored: Socrates is at once the most Athenian, most local, citizenly, and patriotic of philosophers; and yet the most self-regarding of Athenians. Exploring that contradiction, between ¡§Socrates the loyal Athenian citizen¡¨ and ¡§Socrates the philosophical critic of Athenian society,¡¨ will help to position Plato¡¦s Socrates in an Athenian legal and historical context; it allows us to reunite Socrates the literary character and Athens the democratic city that tried and executed him. Moreover, those help us to understand Plato¡¦s presentation of the strange legal and ethical drama.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates was put on trial because he was charged with crimes. The first was “corrupting the youth.” (43) The second was “refusing to acknowledge the gods acknowledged by the city.” (43) The third count was “introducing new divinities.” (43) The reason Socrates was put on trial was because he was going around challenging men about their knowledge and wisdom. He was told by an Oracle that he was the wisest man who lived, but he was skeptical about it, so he went and tested out that theory. He went around questioning men, usually different groups such as politicians or rich men who thought they knew everything about the world. However Socrates always showed them up and they got so angry they decided to take him to trial, for what they call “corrupting…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s “Defense of Socrates” is a detailed account of Socrates being tried before the Athenian court. The “Defense” is written in first person, though it is actually written by Plato, who is an outside observer to the trial. According to Plato, there is a manifold of reasons as to why Socrates was on trial. The Athenians believed Socrates as guilty of blasphemy, investigating concepts that failed to acknowledge the presence of gods, as well as, corrupting the youth.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 399 BC, a famous Athenian philosopher by the name of Socrates was found guilty in two offenses. The city of Athens gathered to hear the trial, and The Apology by Plato allows to better understand what was said in Socrates’ defense and sort through the logistics of the case. Meletus, the prosecutor, charged Socrates with an account of living an impious life and with a second account of corrupting the youth of Athens. Yet, I can attest that truly Socrates was innocent in the case of these two accounts because Socrates greatest desire was to do justice for gods and the people of Athens, and to educate the city in order to expedite a reconstruction. Hegel, a literary critic expresses his views in The Lectures on the History of Philosophy, and…

    • 1765 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socartes

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the case of Socrates and the ancient Athenian government, it is difficult to determine whether or not he was actually guilty. We have to keep in mind that the Athenian Law is much different than laws today. Even though Athenian laws may have been unjust, they were still laws and Socrates’ trial would have to assessed accordingly. In other words, the laws in Athens back then may be immoral today, but they were still enforced and absolute. Also, there may be some information and evidence that was lost in translation. Some part of Plato’s recount of that day vanished over the years, and we are now stuck with a case with little to no evidence. However, from what we are given, I think that Socrates is innocent.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this essay I will present a summary and critique of Plato’s dialogue Crito, focusing especially on Socrates’ arguments in favor of his obligatory obedience to the Athenian state’s death sentence. In response I will argue the position that no one naturally holds any obligation to obey the arbitrary commands of another (or any body of others such as a state), and further that no one can come to hold such obligations even by contract; although people may still be obligated to obey commands issued to them, when what is commanded is obligatory independent of it being commanded by anyone. Thus I will argue that that if, as both Socrates and Crito presume, the command that Socrates be executed is contrary to true justice (that is, contrary to any natural moral obligations, independent of its legality), then Socrates has no obligation to obey it; and in fact those tasked to carry out the order are morally obligated to disobey it, and by their obedience become conspirators to a moral crime. The dialogue begins with Socrates in prison, awakening to Crito’s presence in his cell, Crito having bribed the guards to gain entry. After brief pleasantries and some talk of when the day of Socrates’ execution will fall, Crito admits to Socrates that his purpose there is to free him from prison and take him abroad to Thessaly, which he assures him can be successfully done thanks to the aid of a number of foreign benefactors. But Socrates is hesitant to leave, believing himself obliged to remain and allow his punishment to be completed, even though his sentence, they both concede, is unjust. Still, Socrates is eager to be convinced otherwise, if Crito can do so by means of reason, and so Crito plies Socrates with many arguments in favor of his escape, arguing not only that it is possible and desirable to escape, and that Socrates could live well outside of Athens, but that it is the just…

    • 3290 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The dialogical philosophy of Socrates, the extensity to which Socrates used dialogues and questions in the search for truth is well explicated in Plato’s book the republic, a compilation of what is widely acknowledged as Socrates’ contribution in the realm of knowledge. The republic, which comprises of book I to book X, exonerates a variety of Socrates dialogues in the endeavor to address problems of philosophy related to virtue, morality, justice, and politics. In this essay, emphasis is given particularly to book II to VII, in an attempt to present a logical view of Socrates’ conception of justice vis-à-vis injustice based on Glaucon and Adeimantus’ arguments.…

    • 2740 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The accusations made against Socrates are summarized in 19b, as “Socrates is a criminal and a busybody, investigating the things beneath the earth and in the heavens and making the weaker argument stronger and teaching others these same things.” He was deemed as a natural philosopher and as a sophist; if these accounts weren’t bad enough, he was also accused of corrupting the youth of Athens.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Did Socrates Corrupt

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socrates, the father of philosophy, and teacher: Is he corrupt? Did this man, who still teaches students thousands of years after his life ended, earn capital punishment? Was it fair to receive such severe punishment for teaching the youth to ask questions? Was an innocent person murdered? Despite it being the unpopular answer to the question, Socrates did deserve his penalty, but only through the perspective of the Athenians. The reasons are simple: Socrates really seemed to have committed the crime.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: Plato. The Trial and Death of Socrates. Trans. G. M. A. Grube. Ed. John M. Cooper. 3rd ed. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Pub., 2000. Print.…

    • 1822 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many have puzzled over Socrates’ contradictory statements between Plato’s Apology and its sequel, the Crito. The stance on justice that Socrates articulates in the Apology seems to be immediately contradicted by the moral opinions he expresses in the Crito. While in a broad sense Socrates appears to offer opposing opinions in each work, when one looks more closely at the meaning behind Socrates’ words, he will find that his apparent inconsistencies are not genuine contradictions and that in accepting his execution, he does in fact act justly through suffering injustice rather than actually committing it.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates was a Greek philosopher who lived from 470 BCE to 399 BCE, unlike other writers of the time he is entirely known through the works of those around him such as Xenophon and Plato. In one of Plato’s work about Socrates, the Apology, Socrates sets up an argument for disobeying the laws of men that he appears to be at odds with another argument in another work about Socrates by Plato about excepting punishment in Crito. Many believes that these inconsistencies are actually the invention of Plato. But regardless of whether these are fictional accounts they are not actually contradictory statements but in fact arguments that support one another, which when understood gives insight into the true difficult situation Socrates found himself in.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Parmenides and Heraclitus

    • 5502 Words
    • 23 Pages

    Socrates ' views are analyzed by studying a conversation between Socrates, Cephalus, his son Polemarchus and his followers. The author explains how Socrates enters into a philosophical dialogue with several different individuals who attempt to set down a firm definition of justice. Socrates then sets out to test and challenge their definitions through his method of questioning and counter-examples in an attempt to arrive at a more secure definition of justice, that which cannot be refuted.…

    • 5502 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Goal of the Course: The general goal of this course is to consider what philosophers call the Socratic commitment. Socrates, a Greek philosopher, 470-399 B.C., was placed on trial in Athens because he questioned the political, moral, and religious practices of Athens. He gave his own defense which his pupil Plato recorded as The Apology (The Defense). When he was convicted for impiety to the gods and for corrupting the youth because he had taught the young adults to question, he was given the opportunity to propose his own penalty. He refused to give up his mission as the one calling Athens to the examined way of life. He refused to leave Athens, if the condition were to be that he had to give up teaching. He summed up his defense in the following way:…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays