Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

The Most Dangerous Game

Good Essays
472 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Most Dangerous Game
“The Most Dangerous Game” Essay

Sanger Rainsford and General Zaroff are very alike in some ways. Both want to have the upper hand in an argument or situation. In the beginning of “The Most Dangerous Game”, Zaroff has the upper hand as he knows the terrain and has a threatening bodyguard. He allowed Rainsford to eat and stay at his château after he fell overboard. At the end of the story, Rainsford has the upper hand as he won “the game”, surprises Zaroff, and forces Zaroff to play the game he forced himself (Rainsford) to play. Both men enjoy hunting—although Zaroff savors it in more ways than Rainsford. Rainsford hunts for sport and has less experience. He writes about the animals he hunts, like snow leopards in Tibet. Zaroff has hunted everywhere and hunted everything and yet he says that it no longer thrills him. Altogether, both are expert hunters and both have military experience—Zaroff from being a Cossack and Rainsford from fighting in France in World War 1. In the beginning, Rainsford is the hunted and Zaroff is the hunter. It twists at the end, with Zaroff being the hunted and Rainsford the hunter. Both would rather be the predator than the prey. Both are very respectful of each other (until Rainsford learns Zaroff is a murderer). They have educated and civilized backgrounds. In the end, it says “In his library he read, to soothe himself, from the works of Marcus Aurelius.” Aurelius was a Roman emperor and philosopher from the early centuries. Over the entire story, he hums bits from a variety of musicals and operas. Both Zaroff and Rainsford think that they are right morally, and in today’s age, Zaroff would be the one under ethical discussion. Zaroff thinks that he is an “angel of mercy” by taking what he thinks to be the “scum of the earth” off the earth: lascars, blacks, Chinese, whites, and mongrels, according to him. Rainsford has what Zaroff calls a mid-Victorian point of view; thinking that every life is important and no man should have the power to take another man’s life away from him. There are some obvious differences, though. Zaroff is an older Cossack from Crimea, Russia. He has hunted since he was five years old. As an adult, he was an officer for the Czar and left Russia after the debacle in 1917. Rainsford is a famous author that writes about game from New York. He is familiar with game, survival techniques, and guns. He is very cultured and finds the fact that Zaroff hunts humans disgusting. Rainsford is extremely strategic and resourceful: he outsmarts Zaroff by hiding right underneath his nose. He ends up killing the bodyguard, Ivan, one of Zaroff’s best dogs; and Zaroff’s chances of taking another life.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Most Dangerous Game

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell is composed of character, setting and conflict. One of the critical themes in the short story is irony, which plays a major role in the story. There is irony in the setting, a remote jungle island, the conflict, murder verses hunting, and the characters, General Zaroff who is a crazed man-hunter and Mr. Rainsford, his prey.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Splendid! One of us is to furnish a repast for the hounds. The other will sleep in this very excellent bed. On guard, Rainsford.”... “He had never slept in a better bed”. (Connell 41) There were some of last few sentences of the story provided a somewhat cryptic ending. This meant that Rainsford had beat Zaroff. Since Zaroff was beat by Rainsford he won his bed. This also means Rainsford has won the hunt and is finally free and does not have to worry about hunting humans or ever being the prey again. The ending didn't tell you a lot, but told you some main things so you know and can put together with what happened next. All of these quotes explain how Rainsford outsmarted Zaroff and won “The Most Dangerous Game.”…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two characters, Rainsford and Zaroff, contrast from each other because they come from different countries of origin. Once Rainsford arrives at Ship-Trap Island and meets Ivan at the door of Zaroff’s chateau he says, “I am Sanger Rainsford of New York” (4). Upon meeting with Ivan at the chateau, Rainsford explains to him that he is a foreign traveler from America and is in need of assistance. On the other hand, Zaroff and his father are from Russia where “He [Zaroff’s…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ultimately Zaroff can be characterized as Mysterious and cruel. First off one way Zaroff is mysterious is he already knows who Rainsford is without ever meeting each other before. Conelle page 44, “It is a very great pleasure and honor to welcome Mr. Sanger Rainsford, the celebrated hunter, to my home… I am General Zaroff.” As you can see from this quote Zaroff is excited to meet Rainsford and immediately wants to get to know him better. My second reason is Zaroff acts strange in general around Rainsford. Conelle page 44 “The menacing look in his eyes did not change… a black uniform trimmed with gray astrakhan.” By this quote you can tell Rainsford is feeling uncertain and curious of him. You can also tell by his first reaction he is in some…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the story, Rainsford shows he is very capable. For example, Rainsford meets face to face with General Zaroff for the first time, and Rainsford shows that he is very capable within the game of hunting when Rainsford is forced to survive. As Zaroff says "I have played the fox, now I must play the cat of the fable."(Connell 31) In the quote, Rainsford has presented he has been the one trying to survive with all his strength and he now can finally revolt against General Zaroff the man who is trying to catch Rainsford and win the game. For instance, Rainsford was forced to swim from falling off of his yacht into the ocean all the way to the Island, showing extreme capability.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the hunt Rainsford does very well against Zaroff and goes on to beat him. The human nature is to survive and he did that through talent and wit. In the end when he finishes the general, the General says to Rainsford “I see, he said. Splendid! One of us it to furnish a repast for the hounds and the other will sleep in this very excellent bed.” This tells that Rainsford survived the night and was able to sneak up into Zaroff’s room. Rainsford enjoyed a good night sleep in Zarrof’s bed while Zaroff was fed to the dogs.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two men don’t feel bad for hunting and taking their prey’s life. As shown when Rainsford remarks, “Who cares how a Jaguar feels, (1)”. Also, how General Zaroff who has already taken many animals lives, then proclaims, “I had to invent a new animal to hunt,” (8). Both examples show how both Rainsford and Zaroff show no empathy for murdering the animals as well as the humans. Therefore, Zaroff and Rainsford alike in the way they hunt. Another way Zaroff and Rainsford are alike is their belief that the world is divided into two classes. Zaroff’s theory being the world is divided by strong/weak. Zaroff states his opinion, “Life is for the strong...The weak were put here to give the strong pleasure,” (9). As for Rainsford’s perspective, he believes, “The world is made up of two classes, the hunted/huntee.” Both men believe that in the world, you're either one or the other. Furthermore, both men show identical qualities after Rainsford kills Zaroff when he sleeps in his bed, “He had never slept in a better bed.” (16). This shows that Rainsford now believes he has the power that Zaroff once had and accepts that he is now like Zaroff. In addition, they both are alike because when…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    He changes his thoughts about hunting cause of general zaroff,rainsford using nature to hide from zaroff and builds traps,borsch is a russian soup that has cream on top,that he is wrong cause instinct is a match for something,rainsford did not want to be zaroff partner and wants to be hunted,the example of a game is playing by the rules,he kills animals and humans which makes rainsford rethink his idea of zaroff and wants to get out of there though how will he get back if he has no boat or something else and at the end of the story what will rainsford do if he won the game,which is interesting to think about though the other people that are trapped are…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zaroff was not going to risk people finding out about his “game”. Evil, mischievous, vile, and cruel, Zaroff represents them all. Zaroff played unfairly. He had a gun, dogs, Ivan, etc. Rainsford only had a knife, clothes, and some food. While Zaroff is deceitful, Rainsford is noble. Zaroff had impressive weapons, but lacked integrity.…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “You were surprised that I recognized your name, You see, I read all books on hunting published in English, French, and Russian.”(p.4, Richard Connell) This use of direct characterization shows that Rainsford is a smart, educated man, because he has written a known book about hunting. In the story Rainsford also says “Thank you, I’m a hunter, not a murderer.”(p.6, Richard Connell) This shows the reader that Rainsford knows what’s right from wrong, and how humans should be treated, rather than how Zaroff treats the men that cross his path.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rainsford is still totally thrilled by the hunt. He has had so much experience in hunting that his experiences have led him to write a book on hunting. Rainsford is willing to spend time, and apparently large sums of money, to pursue his game. Rainsford sees himself as the strong, and he sees the animal as weak, non-intelligent target of his hobby. Zaroff, though he considers himself strong, sees hunting not just as a hobby, but as a way of life. The General depends heavily…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the story, The Most Dangerous Game, Richard Connell shows that Rainsford is regretful, anxious, and fearful. First, it is shown that Rainsford is regretful due to the fact that General Zaroff gives him the option to play the most dangerous game or be whipped by Ivan, to which Rainsford chooses to play the game. Rainsford tries again and again to fall asleep at night, but he is helpless with his choice replaying in his mind. “Rainsford could not quiet his brain with the opiate of sleep.” Second, Rainsford’s anxiousness is shown because he is uneasy about the thought of not being able to see the day after next. Although he is a marvelous hunter, there is a possibility that he may be no match to someone who is undefeated in assassinating humans.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Everyday I hunt, and I never grow bored now, for I have a quarry of which I can match my wits, (8).” Zaroff speaks his mind about how bored he is with hunting animals. Rainsford hunts animals because he loves the sport of hunting. “It’s the best sport in the world,” as Rainsford calls it. Considering what both men say, it shows they have different morals about hunting and life. Those two points of view about hunting go against each other as Zaroff challenges Rainsford to hunt. Another main way General Zaroff and Rainsford aren’t alike is that General Zaroff believes that humans are on the Earth to provide himself entertainment and Rainsford believes they deserve respect. General Zaroff says, “ I hunt the scum of the Earth: sailors from tramp ships--lassars, blacks, Chinese, Whites, mongrels--...,(9).” To rephrase it, Zaroff obviously gives no consideration about human life as he shows in the story. Rainsford believes the opposite of that, he says, “But they are men, (9).” in response to what Zaroff says.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    General Zaroff Quotes

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages

    General Zaroff doesn't only hunt animals, he hunts men. Rainsford thinks what General Zaroff is doing is murder. Zaroff claims that animals are to boring to hunt for, so he switches to people. General Zaroff has came to the conclusion that he wants to hunt Rainsford. General Zaroff is a determined character because of how he hunts.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Most Dangerous Game

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. General Zaroff is not a credible character at all. He is the opposite and beyond evil. General hunts people and calls it a sport. That shows us his negative actions. Secondly General things that its alright for him to destroy the weak for his own pleasure. As he states “Life is for the strong, to be lived by the strong, and if need be, taken by the strong. The weak of the world were put here to give the strong pleasure. I am strong why should I not use my gift” that clearly implies that he wants pleasure from another persons pain. Last but not least When Rainsford escaped from the General he was mad, General was hoping to kill him.” Two slight annoyances kept him from perfect enjoyment. One was the thought that it would be difficult to replace Ivan, the other was that his quarry had escaped him” That also implies that he only cares about replacing his servants and having someone do things for him. General also created an island called “The Ship Trap” where giant rocks with razor edges crouch like a sea monster with wide-open jaws can crush a ship easily. The island is his trap for his hunt. Situations like this could unfold in today’s society for example people having too much greed and jealous and that can lead them going out of their way doing evil things to get what they want. For an example if there was an island with humans and no animals and we were starving I’m pretty sure we would hunt and kill the human and make them our meal. “…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays