Preview

Marxist View of the Capitalistic Mode of Production and Exploitation Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1123 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Marxist View of the Capitalistic Mode of Production and Exploitation Essay Example
Karl Marx's view on the capitalistic mode of production highlights the exploitative nature of this economic system and points to its development as a necessary continuation of feudal societies many centuries ago. He demonstrates how the bourgeoisie take advantage of the labor power of the proletariat, creating profit and fueling the expansion necessary to keep profit margins at acceptable levels. Marx argues that this economic system, in which capital is the basis of wealth, sprung from the fall of feudalism when the means of production made obsolete the feudalistic relations of production, in which ownership of land was the basis of wealth. His claim, therefore, that capitalistic societies are exploitative class societies is true when one considers the relationship between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat in our own modern economic system. Marx claims that societies which make use of the capitalistic mode of production are exploitative, and this claim is proven through his description of the needs of this system and the ways in which the bourgeoisie fulfill those needs. The capitalist mode of production requires exploitation because it relies on the profit created when labor is bought in one market and the product of that labor is sold in that or another market at a higher price. The difference between the cost of labor input and the revenue of product output is the surplus value, which according to Marx is directly related to surplus labor, which can also be defined as profit. Because the means of production, or the technology, machinery, and methods involved in production, are so far advanced, the old mode of production of feudal society is not a viable option for a member of the proletariat to sustain himself. Therefore, he his bound to the bourgeoisie and is dependent upon it to give payment for his capacity to provide labor. This dependency of the proletariat upon the bourgeoisie constitutes the choke-hold which the latter has on the well being

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx’ theory of the relations of production can be used as an important platform in locating the origins of class and gender inequity to the early stages of capitalism. In his theory ‘the relations of production’ he explained that private ownership of…

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx then goes into the first part of the body of his manifesto entitled "Bourgeois and Proletarians." In this part, he goes into how society started communal but then became more unequal as time went on. Systems such as Feudalism, Mercantilism, and Capitalism benefited from the use of exploitation. He first introduces the idea that economic concerns of a nation drive history, and that the struggle between the rich bourgeoisie and the hard working proletariat would eventually lead to Communism. He goes on and on about how the bourgeois have always got what they wanted. Marx reflected more on the negatives committed by the bourgeois than the positives. He states the bourgeoisie "has agglomerated population, centralized means of production, and has concentrated property in a few hands." (Marx, p.8) He then describes the proletarians, or the labor class, and how they were formed, how they have suffered, and how they must overcome their struggles. Marx declares that this “dangerous class,” the social scum, that passively rotting mass thrown off by the lowest layers of old society, may, here and there, be swept into the movement by a proletarian revolution." (Marx, p.15) This began an inevitable revolution where the proletariats take over and dethrone the bourgeoisie.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Marx’s view on trade union, the relationship of production in the Capitalism has two important sides, which is the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. The bourgeoisie is the owner of market to produce products. Their goal is to increase their markets to have more money, surplus value, and wealth (Tucker, p.473). The proletariat is the worker who works for the bourgeoisie, but receive their wages based on their work (p. 473). Basically, workers produce the products using bourgeoisie’s material for the market.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx’s philosophy has been the subject of so much judgement and Scrutiny on if his beliefs will truly save the working man. The bourgeois interlocutor believe Marx’s belief would be more detrimental to the people as a whole. They believe that by wishing to abolish private property, communism will become a danger to freedom and eventual end up destroying the very base of all personal freedom, activity, and independence. Marx responds to these comments by stating that wage labor does not create any property when considering the laborers affairs. It only creates capital, a property which works only to increase the social injustice of the worker. This property called capital, is based on class antagonism. Having linked private property…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He uses information that has obviously been aware to many. When Marx disagrees with the private ownership of property, such technique is fairly visible. He believes that “Property, in its present form, is based on the antagonism of capital and wage labour.” For the Bourgeois society, “the right of personally acquiring property as the fruit of a man’s own labour, which property is alleged to be the groundwork of all personal freedom, activity and independence.” However, Marx claims that in this Bourgeois society, the workers do not work the sake of themselves but for the sake of the bourgeois and that “All that we want to do away with is the miserable character of this appropriation, under which the labourer lives merely to increase capital, and is allowed to live only in so far as the interest of the ruling class requires it.” According to Marx, it is logic that a labour should work for the purpose of working. Thus, he believes that labours working for the Bourgeois lost their sole purpose of existence-work. He claims that in the Bourgeois society, the Proletarians are used to increase capital and the Bourgeois property only, and become useless after they have done their job. In the Communist society, “accumulated labour is but a means to widen, to enrich, to promote the existence of the labourer.” Through the use of reasoning concepts that were obvious to the readers even before it was ever reasoned in this document, Marx persuades the audience that the function of the Bourgeoisie society is…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Karl Marx and Adam Smith

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In contrast, Karl Marxl reasoned that workers would be broken by any capitalist, or factory owners, because he believed that a capitalist system provides an advantage for the rich and a disadvantage for the poor. The rich would get richer and the poor would get poorer. Furthermore, the “capitalist” is always in a better position to negotiate a low wage for his workers, he argued. One of his notable and more arguable theories claims that the value of a good or service is directly connected to the amount of labor required for its production. Interestingly, Karl Marx also had his own drastic, political ideas that were far away from those of Adam Smith’s.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capitalism is defined as ‘An economic and political system in which a country 's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit.’ It is based on the division between two classes, one of which owns the labour of the other. Not only do the upper classes, or the bourgeoisie, own the means of physical production but also the means of ‘mental production’. They control and manipulate society through the rule of education, religion and the media. Althusser distinguishes between repressive state apparatuses and ideological state apparatuses and argues about how the bourgeoisie manages to maintain its rule. He argues that the repressive includes the police and the army in which use physical force to control the working class as opposed to the ideological apparatuses such as the media and religion which control the development of ideas. A key component of capitalism is that the working class are forced to sell their labour in exchange for wages in order to survive. However, they do not receive an equal exchange for the labour they produce, but only the cost of subsistence. The difference of what the bourgeoisie receive from the labourers and the amount they pay back is called the surplus value, meaning the profit they make.…

    • 1529 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this argument, Marx evidently claims the development to be inevitable, and capitalism to be inherently unstable. Marx suggests however, the productive forces of capitalism to be compatible with the exploitative relationship between the Bourgeoisie and the Proletariat, suggesting revolution of the proletariat must take place. Although, Marx argues that the elimination of all social classes will not and cannot come about through social reforms or adjustments in government, as the Bourgeoisie will ultimately still claim authority in society. With this, as by the means of the class’ nature, the members of the Proletariat cannot reallocate property in favor of the bourgeoisie, as they cannot appropriate property.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wealth is one of the contributors to capitalism, but the pure accumulation of wealth is not what is defined to be capitalism. Capitalism, for the purposes of this essay, will be defined to be the relentless pursuit of not just wealth, but profit. One of the significant implications of capitalism is the exploitation of laborers, which contributes to the creation of different types of classes, including the proletariat. Before the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries in England, there was a feudal system with lords who owned land and had serfs working the land.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evaluate Marxism

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Critically analyse one theoretical tradition Marxist theory is a tradition which was established in the mid 19th century. Marxism is a sociology of exploitation, it is a theory that believes that exploitation is at the heart of social system. Exploitation does not only happen 'economically' as the entire social system, culture, belief systems, politics and states are organised around the principle of exploitation. This essay will critically analyse Marxist and the political economy which has become a theatrical tradition on exploitation as well as explore different theories on Marxist. Theorist such as Marx and Engle's believe the transition from feudalism to capitalism rise to economic and political dominance of the Bourgeoises.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Class inequality, class struggle or exploitation of the working class has always been a motivating factor for every historical revolution. Karl Heinrich Marx, a German political economist and socialist revolutionary, in his publication “The Communist Manifesto”, describes the nature and history of the conflict between the Bourgeoisies and Proletarians due to class inequality and struggle. In the initial introductory line he writes, “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles" (01). Marx’s based his publication on the derogation and exploitation of the working class Proletarians by the ruling class, the Bourgeoisie, in a capitalist society. In the manifesto, he depicts how the Bourgeoisie rule over the Proletarians by the control of private property and class the…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Economically, he opined that capitalism is very unfair and dehumanizing, in that the laborers or the masses were meant to work for a few rich people who profit by paying very low wages. (2) He however noted the defining features of capitalism as alienation, exploitation and reoccurring, cyclical depressions leading to mass unemployment;(1) on the other hand capitalism is also characterized by "revolutionizing, industrializing urbanization.(3) Marx considered the capitalist class to be one of the most revolutionary in history, because it constantly improved the means of production, more so than any other class in history, and was responsible for the overthrow of feudalism and its transition to capitalism.(4-5) Capitalism can stimulate considerable growth because the capitalist can, and has an incentive to; reinvest profits in new technologies and capital equipment. Karl Marx believed that throughout history, since the feudal ages, proletariats (working class) have been abused by higher classes, especially bourgeoisie (middle class). In Communism, proletariats are in…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For Marx the ultimate contradiction within capitalism exist in the relationship between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. According to him the bourgeoisie produces the proletariat by so doing they are producing their own grave diggers. (George, 2000)…

    • 1873 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Our aim in this essay is to argue that in the contemporary time where the very existence of the human race is threatened by the ravishing of the planet in the name of profit; mass unemployment, which was confidently asserted to be a thing of the past, has reappeared in all the advanced countries of capitalism, not to speak of the nightmare of poverty, ignorance, wars and epidemics which constantly afflict two thirds of humanity in the so-called "Third World." Hence, the current global crises of capitalism and the continuing economic recession resoundingly vindicate the Marxist analysis and appraisal of capitalism. To achieve this aim, we will review the background of Karl Marx theory and his ideological programme of overthrowing capitalist society by a communist revolution. This will serve as a springboard to our argument on the relevance of Marxism in the contemporary time.…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays