82A04-8876-CB285‚ White vs. Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. The lawyers in this case are Benjamin Walton‚ and Mr. Van Meter who represent the defendants Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern‚ as well as‚ Jackson Welch and Amanda Babot who represent the plaintiff Debbie White. They are a group of four very impressive first year law students. The case is based on an incident that occurred when Mrs. White and her husband‚ Mr. White‚ were having dinner at O’Malley’s Tavern. Mr. Edward Hard‚ Mrs. White’s ex-fiancé
Premium Plaintiff Judgment Alcohol intoxication
negligence has the potential to impose wide liability on defendants. The approach of the courts has traditionally been to try control the scope of allowable claims in negligence and to limit their bounds while balancing the rights to compensation of plaintiffs and the rights of defendants not to be disproportionately burdened. Elias CJ’s quote raises an interesting question about the emphasis of the courts in the formula they have developed to test actionable negligence. Similarities between these formulae
Premium Negligence Law Plaintiff
Legal Process Paper University of Phoenix Employment Law MGT/434 Patrice D. Carrington‚ Esq. March 3‚ 2009 Legal Process Paper John’s first step in the process is to go online or visit the nearest EEOC office. There they have an assessment system consisting of two parts. To determine if the EEOC is the appropriate agency to give John help‚ Part one asks general questions about the complaint. John will be asked if he wants to complete Part two after he answers the Part one questions
Premium Dispute resolution Jury Lawsuit
called litigation’ (Cheeseman‚ 2010). The traditional system of litigation involves various phases‚ which include suit‚ answer‚ discovery and trial or jury. In order to start the process of litigation the person who is suing‚ called the plaintiff‚ should raise a suit against the offender called the defendant‚ by filing a complaint in court. The complaint should list the parties‚ state the charges and laws violated‚ and have a prayer for relief. This is sent by the court in the form of summons
Premium Lawsuit Dispute resolution Jury
Mareva acts in personam‚ therefore would act against Mrs Tinkler - not the trust. * Bushan Steel [96] UCPR 25.14 (which was introduced in the court on 5 June 2006) is similar in terms to Federal Court Rule‚ Order 25A‚ r 5‚ (which came into operation on 1 August 1979). [97] I have not been referred to any cases that have directly considered the questions raised in this case in respect of UCPR 25.14. [98] The approach adopted by judges in the Federal Court to identical or substantially identical
Premium Jurisdiction Appeal Plaintiff
attended is February 20th‚ 2014 at 9:00 a.m. 3. Number of department is Dept. 2‚ and the name of the judge is Patricia M. Lucas. 4. John V. Komar is the attorney for the plaintiff (Malaysia Venture Capital Management Berhad) and Chris Kao is the attorney for the defendant (Mobifusion‚ Inc) 5. Nature of dispute: a) The plaintiff‚ MavCap‚ filed the case against Mobifusion‚ Inc. In exchange for a securing three million dollar investment from MavCap; in 2010‚ Mobifusion agreed in the Note Purchase Agreement
Premium Contract Plaintiff Defendant
Hyun Lee Eastman Kodak v. Image Technical Services -- Plaintiff This is yet another case that concerns the standard for summary judgment in an antitrust controversy. The principal issue here is whether a defendant’s lack of market power in the primary equipment market precludes — as a matter of law — the possibility of market power in derivative aftermarkets. Eastman Kodak Company manufactures and sells photocopiers and micrographic equipment. Kodak also sells service and replacement parts
Premium Photographic film Photography
mills Ltd. Which is the respondent of this case .in this particular case the plaintiff pleads that he has provided his services which are not being treated well . the plaintiff dispatches some wagons of coal as an agent to the textile mills at a price of 11936/78 paisa . But the party to which he sells the goods does not collect the goods on time which further leads the railway authority to cease the good . the plaintiff had to make the payment on the behalf of the textile mill with the amount
Premium Defendant Pleading Plaintiff
Port Regulation of Davao This petition for review with prayer for a writ of preliminary injunction and/or restraining order filed by petitioners‚ Philippine Ports Authority ("PPA" for brevity)‚ Port Manager Bienvenido Basco and the Port District Manager‚ Ernesto Fernando of Davao City‚ challenges the jurisdiction of the Regional Trial Court of Davao City‚ Branch 17‚ in a case involving the legality of port charges imposed by the PPA on the respondent Terminal Facilities and Services Corporation
Premium Court Injunction Appellate court
You Decide: Susie Marks vs. City of Elsewhere and Officer Ruthless Susie Marks caught a ride to Elsewhere City Park from Orson‚ who then dropped her off and left. She met her friend Jerry and his girlfriend Kate. Orson was to return for Susie at 11:00 p.m.‚ which is the park’s curfew. Around 11:00 p.m. Officer Ruthless of the Elsewhere Police Department‚ approached the three minors and informed them the park was closing and instructed to leave the park immediately. Unfortunately‚ Orson had not
Premium Pickup truck Negligence Tort law