imperfect labor and capital markets‚ managers will seek to maximize their own utility at the expense of corporate shareholders. Agents have the ability to operate in their own self-interest rather than in the best interests of the firm because of asymmetric information and uncertainty (e.g.‚ myriad factors contribute to final outcomes‚ and it may not be evident whether the agent directly caused a given outcome‚ positive or negative). Evidence of self-interested managerial behavior includes the consumption
Premium Management Principal-agent problem Economics
Main section As cited by Cheffines and Bank (2009)‚ the foundation of agency theory could go back to Berle and Means (1932) and Fama and Jensen (1983a). Their studies discuss the notion of the separation of corporation’s owners (principals) and its manager (agents) which is due to the fact that the owners delegate their responsibilities for control to managers who will actually manage the company. Thus the separation between the functions of decision and control will generate conflicts of interest
Premium Governance Principal-agent problem Management
In a broad manner‚ organisational theories can be defined as formal social organisations and their interrelationship with the environment in which they operate. This reading provides insight into the agency and the contingency organisational theories‚ and how management implement these theories into the environment in which their business operates. It also outlines the issues and limitations of these theories‚ using the Coca Cola company as a relevant case study. In addition‚ this essay examines
Premium Coca-Cola Organization Management
about the association between the boss‚ which is the Principal‚ and the worker‚ which is the Agent. A good example for an application of the Agency Theory would be sharecropping‚ where the Principal is the landowner and the Agent is the farmer. Another example for the Agency Theory in a more familiar organizational structure would be the relationship between a company’s shareholders‚ which is the Principal‚ and the company’s CEO‚ which is the Agent. As seen from the table below‚ Agency Theory clearly
Premium Principal-agent problem Information asymmetry
Access to HE Diploma: BTEC Higher Nationals from 2010 – XXXX | Unit title(s): Unit 2. Managing Financial Resources and Decisions | Unit code(s): H/601/0548 | Learner: | Assessor: | Internal Verifier: | Title of Assignment: Principal-Agent problemRelated learning outcomes: 1 Understand the sources of finance available to a business | Assignment Number:__1__ of __8__for this Unit | Date set: Feb 26‚ 2013 | | Date for final submission: Mar. 5‚ 2013 | Learner declaration:
Premium Dow Jones Industrial Average Educational psychology Financial statements
the more recent literature on corruption as a principal-agent problem whose significance for development depends on its dimensions related to the nature of the corrupt transaction itself‚ such as distinctions based on the agents involved‚ scale‚ type of deal‚ predictability‚ industrial organisation‚ etc.‚ all of which affect for better or worse the nature of the relationship between principal (as represented by the public interest) and the agent (politicians and bureaucrats). From this viewpoint
Premium Political corruption Bureaucracy Politics
Genzyme Corporation Problem: High equity financing company Genzyme has a tradition to be financed with equity. High equity ratio has advantages such as low agency costs related to debt‚ lower financial stress and more flexibility for management‚ which is especially crucial for start-up companies‚ such as in the early stage of Genzyme. However‚ besides losing the tax shield from debt‚ high equity financing leads to an increasingly diffused ownership‚ which would in turn causes problems such as shareholder
Premium Stock market Information asymmetry Finance
Research Problem 1.2 Literature Review 1.3 Scope and Objectives 1.4 Research Questions 1.5 Research Methodology CHAPTER 2: Modes of termination of agency: A Synopsis CHAPTER 3: Effects of termination of agency: A Discussion CHAPTER 4: Duty of agent on termination of agency CHAPTER 5: Conclusion Bibliography CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ‘’Agent’’ and ‘’principal’’ are defined in Section 182 of the Indian Contract Act‚ 1872 in the following words: 182."Agent" and "principal"
Premium Contract Agency Agent
* Organizational structure + Principal*-Agent problem Principal-Agent Problem There is separation between ownership & control in most of the firm that we see today. As owners‚ shareholders appoint managers to make decisions for the company. There is another term to describe relationship between them. Shareholders are the PRINCIPAL that appoints the manager (AGENT) to act on the shareholders’ behalf so that profit can be maximize. E.g. Patient-Doctor Managers-Employees
Premium Decision making Management Profit maximization
relationship between principals and agents in business (In this relationship‚ the principal hires an agent to do the work‚ or to perform a task the principal is unable or unwilling to do. For example‚ in corporations‚ the principals are the shareholders of a company‚ delegating to the agent i.e. the management of the company‚ to perform tasks on their behalf.) Agency theory is concerned with resolving problems that can exist in agency relationships; that is‚ between principals (such as shareholders)
Premium Principal-agent problem Organizational studies Organization