The Disparity Between Intellect and Character Melisse A. Powell Basic Critical Thinking Instructor Krista Bridgmon 3). How would you explain the fact that morally evil people can be highly educated in terms of ethics and religion? In other words‚ how do you account for the gap that sometime occurs between knowledge of ethics and being an ethical person? The difference between the knowledge of ethics and being an ethical person‚ is that ethical knowledge is knowledge that can be taught
Premium Ethics Morality
Critical Thinking Week 1 Assignment: Critical Thinking Describe a situation in which critical and creative thought could have been used for a better outcome. Describe why it is important to think critically and creatively in similar situations. While working at an agency‚ it was decided that the company should introduce a work-order form that would ease the load of work that was done by the administrative
Premium Critical thinking Thought Mind
Strayer University Online Campus Critical Thinking PHI 210 ‘’Critical Thinking Paper: Revised’’ Assignment 5 June 10‚ 2012 Submitted to Prof. Naomi Sanderovsky By Janet Rivera Cruz Introduction In the United States‚ there is social unrest regarding the government’s denial of the right to marry for homosexuals. Plenty of conservatives are completely against gay marriage; and many of liberals are fighting for equal treatment. The neo-Christian politicians are using religious
Premium Same-sex marriage Homosexuality Marriage
DMBA 610 Individual Paper Assignment Week 2: Critical Thinking and Decision making Assignment: Individual Paper Assignment: Individual Paper (15%) Your instructor will post a business memo that you will need to analyze applying the critical thinking model discussed in Asking the Right Questions. In a short paper (7-8 double-spaced pages) apply all of the steps of the critical thinking model to assess the arguments made in the memo. Include all of the steps. Leaving out discussion
Premium Critical thinking Ambiguity Reasoning
people to do great things.” The purpose of this speech to evaluate Oprah Winfrey speech utilizing the critical thinking skills that have been acquired during term. The paper explains the purpose of the speech as well as answers questions to why words or phases were selected. Running Head: Oprah Winfrey Eulogy for Rosa Parks 3 Given the General Education Assignment in my Critical Thinking class was to evaluate the famous eulogy that Oprah Winfrey had spoken on October 31‚ 2005 at Metropolitan
Premium African American Critical thinking Oprah Winfrey
Assignment 1 - Critical Thinking University of Maryland University College Assignment 1 - Critical Thinking The Purpose of this paper is to apply the 10 steps developed by (Browne & Keeley‚ 2010) and I will apply those methods on the following memo. A memo was drafted by Ms. Mary Ford (personal communication‚ January 30‚ 2012) who is Director of Amalgamated Public Employees Union (APEU) Local No. 121 to Mr. Hector Fuentes the President of APEU Local No. 121 on the issue on New Mexico State
Premium Management Education Health care
Critical Thinking Skills: Assignment 2- Assessing Arguments (these counts Part 1: Identifying Reasons (10 marks) In each question choose the answer that could be a reason for the conclusion. Say why this is the correct answer and the others are not. Don’t worry about whether or not the reason is true‚ just whether or not it supports the conclusion. 1. Conclusion: Those people who die from drowning are more likely to be swimmers than non-swimmers. a. People who cannot swim are much more
Premium Blood donation Critical thinking Teeth
Name _Jordan Peterson___________ Critical Thinking Week 2 Homework (50 pts) 1. (12 pts.) Label each definition with the appropriate name of the fallacy from the following list. (Note there will be two fallacy names that are not used.) Ad hominem/attacking the person | Ad ignorantiam/appeal to ignorance | Ad populum/appeal to the people | Ad misercordiam/appeal to pity | Begging the Question/Circular Reasoning | Equivocation | Red Herring | Straw Man | A. Sliding from one
Premium Critical thinking Fallacy
Course Critical Thinking Test Week 5 Quiz Started 2/8/14 4:00 PM Submitted 2/8/14 4:54 PM Status Completed Attempt Score 100 out of 100 points Time Elapsed 53 minutes out of 2 hours. Instructions This quiz consist of 20 multiple choice questions and covers the material in the first half of Chapter 9. Be sure you are in Chapter 9 when you take the quiz. Question 1 5 out of 5 points To form a valid syllogism‚ which premise is missing in the following argument? [missing
Premium Logic
Techniques for Writing Multiple-Choice Items that Demand Critical Thinking · Premise - Consequence Analogy Case Study Incomplete Scenario Problem/Solution Evaluation Premise - Consequence Students must identify the correct outcome of a given circumstance. Example: If nominal gross national product (GNP) increases at a rate of 10% per year and the GNP deflator increases at 8% per year‚ then real GNP: a) Remains constant. b) Rises by 10%. c) Falls by 8%. d) Rises by 2%. Note:
Premium Question Creativity Student